Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Metal Detector Testing

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

FSQAManager2025

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 6 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted Today, 08:24 PM

Good afternoon! Since I've worked here my company has always relied on an X-Ray machine for foreign material detection. We test this using three test wands (FE, Non-FE, SS) throughout the production day. However, we recently purchased a metal detector to add in-line as a backup plan in case the X-Ray machine goes down. I know that the metal detector needs to be added to our procedures/risk assessments, etc. However, since we only plan to use it when the X-Ray machine isn't working, it doesn't need to be check every day, only the days we use it right? And when testing, can we use the same test wands that we use for the X-Ray or do they need to be different? Any guidance is appreciated. Thank you in advance!


  • 0

kconf

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 475 posts
  • 45 thanks
93
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted Today, 08:36 PM

Only if your metal detector can do or exceed what x ray machine is currently doing, as per your operational procedure. 

 

I am not sure what you mean by it doesn't need to be checked everyday. What doesn't need to be?


  • 0

FSQAManager2025

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 6 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted Today, 08:41 PM

Only if your metal detector can do or exceed what x ray machine is currently doing, as per your operational procedure. 

 

I am not sure what you mean by it doesn't need to be checked everyday. What doesn't need to be?

To make sure that it's working properly, such as running the test wands through it. 


  • 0

kconf

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 475 posts
  • 45 thanks
93
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted Today, 08:56 PM

I'd say you can check it only when you use it, as long as it is annually calibrated and verified for performance per its manufacturer's guidance. I don't see why you can't use the same test wands. Everything should be documented in your SOP/risk analysis. 


  • 1

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,077 posts
  • 916 thanks
476
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Today, 09:34 PM

One question I'd raise is are your test wands specifically designed for x-rays?  The reason I ask is because some metal detection ones are designed with plastics which on certain settings (and depending on your product) may be x-ray visible.  I've normally seen test cards used instead which have thinner, flexible plastic.

 

Ones like this kind of thing:

 

Laminated X-Ray Test Card | Card for X-Ray Detector | Detectamet

 

So if you're using wands, I'd see no problem with using them for a metal detector, the question I'd have is if you should be using them for the x-ray.  Your technician could help advise.  It really might not be a problem for your product but certainly in the past (over a decade ago) I saw a test wand where the whole wand was visible to the x-ray on the settings they were using basically meaning they weren't checking for, say, 2mm but their test was showing them they could pick up a 50mm piece of hard plastic instead.  Great but not what the test was designed for.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 984 posts
  • 195 thanks
326
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 40 minutes ago

We have a variety of devices and use the same pool of test pieces for them all under normal circumstances.  Most "non-ferrous" tend to be brass so this will probably be fine, as long as your instruments have the same lower threshold for sensitivity and you validate it.

 

We also have "extra" devices that can be used as backups or for processes that aren't done frequently.  Like our offline "rework" units.  These are given the annual checks, but only receive monitoring/verification testing when they are being used. Making sure to include a before and after is the only extra consideration, when compared to the units that are operating nearly 24/7.


  • 0



Share this


10 user(s) are reading this topic

1 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users