Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

METAL DETECTOR for strawberry packaging

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic
- - - - -

MOURADTALBI

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 86 posts
  • 7 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Tunisia
    Tunisia
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My main interests are: football, pool, cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport.
    I love organic food
    Food Safety & Quality News

Posted 23 November 2025 - 10:49 AM

Hi comunity, 
 
I need your help: 
 
We are implementing a food safety management system according to the BRCGS FOOD standard for a company that packages strawberries and blueberries in trays.
My question is, according to BRCGS FOOD, is it necessary to install metal detection equipment?
 
 
I have to add  that last year another site that produces and packages tomatoes passed the BRCGS standard without installing a metal detector.
 
Thanks,

Edited by MOURADTALBI, 23 November 2025 - 10:50 AM.

  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,094 posts
  • 919 thanks
477
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 23 November 2025 - 09:09 PM

Hmm, interesting question.  I've never worked in produce but how I would approach it would be by risk (before you even think of BRC).

 

Is there a risk of metal in the strawberries or something being damaged in your process?  Is the picking by hand?  Is any of it automated at all?  Presumably the flow wrapping of the trays may be but with limited risk?

 

Are consumers likely to consume the product without thoroughly inspecting it?  It's possible. 

 

That said, metal detectors are pretty cheap nowadays.  So I would be inclined to say "yes" and get one anyway if I could.  

 

As for BRCGS.

 

Section 4.10.1.1 requires you to do a risk assessment for the potential use of equipment for removing foreign material, not that you have to have a metal detector.

 

That said, the interpretation guideline is pretty much written as though "yes you will have at least a metal detector" not "there are times you may not need one" (it's worth having a read, I expected it to list occasions when it may not be needed.  It doesn't do anything like that.)  The older versions of the standard were much more flexible about it from memory.

 

I think in summary it's possible to not have metal detection, especially where it's for a food which a consumer shouldn't be eating without cleaning it themselves (although you know "shouldn't" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there).  So can you get away with it?  I think it's possible but I'd make sure that risk assessment is SUPER robust and I'd consider it anyway because it's probably good practice if you have any level of mechanisation.  


Edited by GMO, 23 November 2025 - 09:10 PM.

  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Thanked by 1 Member:

mm.stf

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted Yesterday, 02:08 AM

All I can think about is the Strawberry Tampering Incident in Australia. 


Edited by mm.stf, Yesterday, 02:09 AM.

  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,094 posts
  • 919 thanks
477
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Yesterday, 07:03 AM

All I can think about is the Strawberry Tampering Incident in Australia. 

 

That crossed my mind too.  I'm not sure they ever found the culprit though as the prosecution was dropped against the supervisor?  My thought was it could have been post site contamination (which would be possible with needles) and possibly more than one person.  But it's a good point that deliberate contamination is something which should be considered as part of your food defence / taccp plan.


Edited by GMO, Yesterday, 07:04 AM.

  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


MOURADTALBI

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 86 posts
  • 7 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Tunisia
    Tunisia
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My main interests are: football, pool, cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport.
    I love organic food
    Food Safety & Quality News

Posted Yesterday, 06:44 PM

All I can think about is the Strawberry Tampering Incident in Australia. 

 

All I can think about is the Strawberry Tampering Incident in Australia. 

Hi,

Thanks a lot stf, 

Interesting  document. 

I will be grateful  if  you could  share  a  HACCP template  plan  for  fresh strawberry  product. 

 

Best Regards


  • 0

kconf

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 483 posts
  • 46 thanks
93
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted Yesterday, 07:03 PM

GMO has good points. Your product itself may not be risky, but the process it undergoes from farm to consumers may have something to consider. I would get one if feasible. 


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

MOURADTALBI

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 86 posts
  • 7 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Tunisia
    Tunisia
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My main interests are: football, pool, cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport.
    I love organic food
    Food Safety & Quality News

Posted Yesterday, 07:46 PM

Hi, 

Does anyone have a complete HACCP study template for fresh strawberry packaging (including the  flowchart)?


  • 0

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,901 posts
  • 1463 thanks
802
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted Today, 02:35 AM

Hi MOURADTALBI,

 

As GMO posted this requires a risk assessment and will depend on the amount of handling the fruit gets from farm to pack and the risk of metal contamination.

 

The standard states:

The absence of metal detection would only normally be based on the use of an alternative, more effective method of protection (e.g. use of X-ray, fine sieves or filtration of products).

 

From BRCGS Guidance:

There will, however, be situations where metal detection does not, on the basis of risk assessment, provide any significant additional protection to the consumer; for example, where whole pieces of fresh produce (e.g. potatoes) are being washed and packed, and any metal contamination would be obvious to the consumer prior to consumption.

 

So you may get away with not having a metal detector if you are packing whole fruits but you should understand that you will fail your certification audit if you fail to convince the auditor that based on risk you don’t need one.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. 

Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.

Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users