Hi
If the metal detector alarms for a product, how do you mark the product, and do you place it somewhere specific to wait for further investigation?
Posted Yesterday, 12:14 PM
Hi
If the metal detector alarms for a product, how do you mark the product, and do you place it somewhere specific to wait for further investigation?
Posted Yesterday, 12:32 PM
We write "METAL" on the bag and take it immediately to the lab for sifting/investigation.
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted Yesterday, 02:08 PM
Yes, write the lot #, date & time, line. Then like MDaleDDF said, take it immediately for further investigation. In my experience, there has been 50-50 chance of finding something.
Posted Yesterday, 04:34 PM
It has depended on the site but in some sites the person doing the detector check does the investigation themselves, in others it's QA but it's immediate because it could signal an issue further upstream.
If you don't find anything it's worth considering if it was just too small or multiple tiny pieces and still potentially an issue if you suddenly start getting lots of "false" rejects. (Bitter experience...)
************************************************
25 years in food. And it never gets easier.
Posted Yesterday, 05:00 PM
I'm not sure about BRC but when I ran an SQF program that had a metal detector we were sure to put the procedure in the metal detector document, which referenced the NCP doc. Those products got placed on NCP; we had a laminated NCP placard, and any hits went right to its own NCP pallet to then be re-ran by the shift supervisor. It had to make 2 clean passes by the shift supervisor who would do it immediately after his accuracy checks. If it flagged again, he/she would rip it open and fill out disposition paperwork that I would then review when I was back in that plant.
You want to make sure any product you set aside is clearly separated/sequestered and has no chance or going through as passed product.
Posted Yesterday, 05:40 PM
So you just separate what was rejected, right? The line that is running the lot keeps running?
Posted Yesterday, 08:49 PM
So you just separate what was rejected, right? The line that is running the lot keeps running?
For one reject, keep running and investigate. For two rejects, stop the line and assess. For two rejects of the same type, stop the factory...
Or at least that was the M&S protocol back in the day and you can see the sense in it but it probably is site dependent. You shouldn't have metal routinely cropping up in your product.
************************************************
25 years in food. And it never gets easier.
Posted Yesterday, 08:59 PM
Stop the line and stop the factory even if they are discovered to be false positive later?
Posted Today, 02:25 AM
Hi Mariann,
Ideally you will be rejecting into a locked cage and then QA will collect the product, mark it as rejected with date/time, check the rejected product by running it through the detector again and then opening and inspection/sieving as appropriate.
Kind regards,
Tony
IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009:
Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording.
Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.
Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted Today, 05:47 AM
Stop the line and stop the factory even if they are discovered to be false positive later?
No, only if metal is found which is one of the reasons why we always did it immediately but also it's the right food safety thing to do. If you have two rejects that look similar, e.g. pieces of metal swarf, you need to find out what is going on to cause it as you're probably missing some in your metal detector (they're not 100% effective.)
But that was M&S protocol, not saying you have to adhere to that but it's a good indicator of what some people think is the right way.
If you're having loads of false rejects, what I'd suggest you do is:
************************************************
25 years in food. And it never gets easier.
Posted Today, 05:48 AM
Thank you all for response. In our plant when metal detector alarms the operators investigate the product. Usually they investigate the product immediately. They write non conformance form and attached there also the metal findings and bring it to the quality.
We had recently audit and the auditor mentioned that the product should be marked somehow, or it should go to some locked box or specific area etc. I am interested to know what kind of solutions other have.