Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

What do you think of this UPF publication?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic
- - - - -

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,318 posts
  • 972 thanks
514
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Yesterday, 03:25 PM

Really interesting we don't seem to have a category for health and diet on here. One for us to think about?

 

Anyway. This was published yesterday. And, honestly? I'm frustrated.

 

From Tobacco to Ultraprocessed Food: How Industry Engineering Fuels the Epidemic of Preventable Disease - GEARHARDT - The Milbank Quarterly - Wiley Online Library

 

Why am I frustrated?

 

Things like this:

 

"Ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) are engineered to heighten reward and accelerate delivery of reinforcing ingredients, driving compulsive consumption and disrupting appetite regulation. This is a growing challenge for health policy."

 

"Both the tobacco and food industries have long employed a strategy known as “health washing,” in which products are reformulated and marketed in ways that create the illusion of reduced harm while preserving their core addictive properties."

 

There is WAY more. Try reading it without steam coming out of your ears at some point.

 

But my frustration is this. I do not argue that the food industry has not supported health in consumers (hence my post on HACCP and health) BUT I do not for one second believe there has ever been intent. I am yet to stumble across the lab of malevolent food scientists rubbing their hands with glee at the fact they've made people ill. I actually see a lot of food scientists reducing sugar, salt, fat, calories etc to follow legislation. If the legislation doesn't go far enough then isn't that the fault of legislators? Then governments change legislation (like the sugar tax in the UK) which has driven increases in non nutritive sweeteners. Manufacturers follow suit, then criticism for it in this paper.

 

And I'm so tired about reading on UPFs. I'm yet to read any causal relationship that goes beyond known science, e.g. high fat foods, high in sugars, simple carbs and salt. They're going to be bad for you. Haven't we been saying that for decades? Hasn't the only change to consumers' diets been through stealth?

 

As I said on my other post, if we got rid of a lot of processed food, in general, obviously we'd be the healthier for it. But we are also not set up for that as a society anymore. Few people want to spend the time to cook from scratch or actually don't have that time to spend. I'd lose no sleep if Pop Tarts were no longer available but I'm surprised at the institutions which published the above when people like us are mostly spending our lives busting a gut to get formulation changes through. God it would have been an easier life if I'd not had to do the 1-2 changes a year on every product I've ever worked on to make it a tweak healthier with every change in process, packaging etc which went along with it.

 

So these are the authors:

 

Ashley Gearhardt Clinical Science Area Chair; Professor of Psychology - Food and Addiction, Science and Treatment. University of Michigan.
Kelly Brownell is the Robert L. Flowers Professor Emeritus of Public Policy. Duke.
Allan M. Brandt, Professor of the History of Science. Harvard.
 
Not necessary for one of them to be a strict food science professor but it appears none are. Is that a problem? I'm unsure. But perhaps it does make the writers unaware of how much the retailers and government determine what is in our food in comparison to the manufacturers.

 

Seems long on hyperbole and short on any blame for anyone else but manufacturers.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,986 posts
  • 1489 thanks
819
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted Today, 05:22 AM

Hi GMO,

 

‘What do you think of this UPF publication?’ - Not a lot

 

Too much sugar, salt and additives but evidence that ‘UPF’ is as bad as tobacco? they are having a giraffe.

 

I stopped at hedonic manipulation, although perhaps this Cadburys advert/product fits the bill?

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations Now available via the recording of the Webinar on Friday 5th December 2025. 

Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.

 

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.

Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.


GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,318 posts
  • 972 thanks
514
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Today, 06:42 AM

What I found frustrating is that those institutions are well respected. It's not as though there are not colleagues in food science who are funded by food manufacturing working in neighbouring buildings that they could not have talked to. What's more it's such a muddle. Some of what they say is valid but they're attributing root causes for it and intent where I can see no work has been done to establish the veracity of their claims.

 

So far, as it deserves, it seems to have received little attention from dietetics colleagues. I suppose it's interesting it was published in the "Milbank Quarterly" for interdisciplinary work on health not a specific dietetics journal. 

I am yet to become a "Hedonic Manipulation Manager" but I look forward to searching for those job opportunities on Linkedin.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users