I'm new to the forums and new to the food industry, so please bear with me if my ignorance (of either or both) shows.
I work for a tea company and we are working on establishing company requirements regarding heavy metals in our ingredients. When I refer to heavy metals I'm talking specifically about: Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury, Chromium, & Lead. I want to make sure the requirements we develop are based on relevant regulatory standards and I could use some help being pointed in the right direction.
I've looked to FDA standards, but - if I understand correctly - there does not exist "blanket" FDA standards for concentration limits of heavy metals in food. I know that there are limits on lead in candy and various metals in fish as well as EPA standards for heavy metals in drinking water. Now, let me further the story a bit, my company sells products internationally as well as within the US; so I might be looking to the wrong regulatory agency in the first place. We sell products to Canada, Mexico, the EU, Australia, and Japan. What I'd like to do is find the most "strict" regulatory requirements of these countries to use as our standard.
Any help or comments you can provide will be greatly appreciated.
Heavy Metal Regulations
Posted 01 March 2011 - 10:59 PM
Thanked by 1 Member:
Thanked by 1 Member:
Posted 18 March 2011 - 07:07 PM
European Union: For the heavy metals cadmium, lead and mercury, maximum levels in certain foods have been established by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006.
Members from other regions please share your regulations.
The IFSQN Admin
Register Here + Upgrade Membership + Helpful Info + Contact Us + Advertising + Store
Introductory video on the IFSQN Supply Food Safety Management System Implementation Packages we have available for the major GFSI Benchmarked schemes including FSSC 22000, SQF Code, BRC and IFS. Watch Video Now >>
This video shows how to download and access the FSMS package and provides an overview of the extensive documentation, records templates, training, checklists and project implementation tools. Watch Video Now >>
Need food safety advice?
Relax, you've come to the right place…
The IFSQN is a helpful network of volunteers providing answers and support. Check out the forums and get free advice from the experts on food safety management systems and a wide range of food safety topics.
We could make a huge list of rules, terms and conditions, but you probably wouldn’t read them.
All that we ask is that you observe the following:
1. No spam, profanity, pornography, trolling or personal attacks
2. Topics and posts should be “on topic” and related to site content
3. No (unpaid) advertising
4. You may have one account on the board at any one time
5. Enjoy your stay!
Thanked by 1 Member:
Posted 24 July 2012 - 07:06 PM
Under Section 402(a)(1) of the FD&C Act(21 U.S.C. 342(a)(1)), a food is deemed adulterated if the food bears orcontains any added poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the foodinjurious to health, and for substances that are not added substances, if thequantity of the substance ordinarily renders the food injurious to health. Assuch, in the event we find a contaminant in a food that poses a health hazard,such that the food is deemed to be adulterated, FDA may lawfully takeappropriate enforcement action.
Aside from thelimited examples identified in below references, FDA has not addressed the issue of heavymetals in foods, and has not instituted any regulation or provided contemporaryrecommendations for heavy metal tolerances for conventional foods generally.
The U.S. Food andDrug Administration (FDA) enforces action levels for poisonous or deleterioussubstances in human food and animal feed, including cadmium, lead, mercury, andothers (ref. 1) The FDA has also developed a comprehensive Food Protection Planto address the challenges and changes occurring in food sources, production,and consumption. (ref. 2). The plan builds upon advances in science andtechnology to protect the nation’s food supply from both unintentionalcontamination and deliberate attack.
The EuropeanCommission directive 1881/2006 (ref 3) specifies maximum levels for Cd,inorganic Sn, Hg, and Pb in a variety of foodstuffs (but not juice-derivedcolourants or food preparations), with, for example, 0.02 mg Pb/kgallowable in milk products and up to 1.5 mg Pb/kg allowable in bivalvemollusks.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Action Levels for Poisonous or Deleterious Substances in Human Food and Animal Feed. Available at: www.fda.gov/Food/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/ChemicalContaminantsandPesticides/ucm077969.htm. Accessed January 21, 2010.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Fact Sheet: Food Protection Plan. Available at: www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodSafetyPrograms/FoodProtectionPlan2007/ucm132705.htm. Accessed January 21, 2010.
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) N
19 downloadso 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006
setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Available
at: eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_364/l_36420061220en00050024.pdf. Accessed January 21, 2010.
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 629/2008 of 2 July 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Available at: www.fsai.ie/uploadedFiles/Commission_Regulation_EC_No_629_2008.pdf. Accessed January 21, 2010.
Thanked by 2 Members:
Posted 25 July 2012 - 06:41 AM
As you hv probably realised, "most strict" encompasses a variety of interpretations. logically any standard should hv a validatable scientific basis, eg involving things like prevalence / consumption habits. Sampling / analytical procedures can also be relevant.
In the (worst?) case scenario, lack of knowledege or intentions for "ultimate' strictness result in a detection limit criterion (philosophically analogous to the micro. zero tolerance).
In practice, most (all?) countries also have an internal sovereign right to select/deselect/modify general requirements to produce their own specific criteria. The exact flexibility may depend on the parameter / status of a "regulation".
You are going to generate an interesting compilation. My guess is that some wide-ranging databases do exist in addition to the useful but mostly localised refs in previous posts. IMEX, i ended up with a (very) large file of every customer country of relevance. And similarly for micro. standards etc. I am guessing that 4/5 of yr posted list will be relatively determinable. EU IMEX (not for tea products) may well be a different proposition. Good luck.
Rgds / Charles.C
Thanked by 1 Member:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users