Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Quick Hello and BRC vs SQF question

Introduction

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Matt Bova

Matt Bova

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 12 December 2017 - 03:08 AM

Hi everyone! New forum member introduction myself and also asking for some tips.

 

I'm a long time QA Manager under the BRC audit standard but last week I started in a Director level position at a facility under SQF.

 

Any pitfalls I should avoid or slight differences I should pay extra attention to as I get familiar with my new standard?

 



#2 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 822 posts
  • 176 thanks
51
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:We specialize in helping small to mid-sized food companies to develop & implement SQF Systems to achieve certification in a relatively short period of time. Our operational area includes all of the America's with 99% of our business in the USA.

Posted 12 December 2017 - 01:56 PM

Hi Matt, welcome.

 

I believe you will find an ease of getting into SQF as SQF is substantially easier in all areas in comparison with BRC. 

 

I am sure that others may argue this, but after ten years of auditing first (SQF) and then consulting on SQF and BRC it is what we have found.

 

Best to you.


Warm regards,

 

Glenn Oster

 

SQF Registered Consultant - Certified for 29 FSC's

Serving clients in: USA, Costa Rica, Panama & Caribbean Islands

International Toll-Free: 800-546-1452

 

http://www.linkedin.com/in/getgoc

 

www.GlennOsterConsulting.com


#3 FurFarmandFork

FurFarmandFork

    QA Manager/FS Blogger

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,001 posts
  • 463 thanks
66
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 12 December 2017 - 03:47 PM

Ditto to SQFConsultant, I find that in compared to other standards, SQF often specifically includes a clause to the tone of "do this, but if you can't, identify controls to make sure that your process/equipment/facility remains safe and effective regardless". In this way it makes you address the hazard, but doesn't necessarily bind you to a specific solution like BRC often does. Heck, half the time for SQF if you can demonstrate compliance with a rule (e.g. storage) and people are trained on it, you can skip an entire "policy" document.


QA Manager and food safety blogger in Oregon, USA.

 

Interested in more information on food safety and science? Check out Furfarmandfork.com for more insights!

Subscribe to have one post per week delivered straight to your inbox.

 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users