Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Quick Hello and BRC vs SQF question

Introduction

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Matt Bova

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 12 December 2017 - 03:08 AM

Hi everyone! New forum member introduction myself and also asking for some tips.

 

I'm a long time QA Manager under the BRC audit standard but last week I started in a Director level position at a facility under SQF.

 

Any pitfalls I should avoid or slight differences I should pay extra attention to as I get familiar with my new standard?

 



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,821 posts
  • 960 thanks
852
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA
    Never give up, never give in - always win!
    Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachusetts

Posted 12 December 2017 - 01:56 PM

Hi Matt, welcome.

 

I believe you will find an ease of getting into SQF as SQF is substantially easier in all areas in comparison with BRC. 

 

I am sure that others may argue this, but after ten years of auditing first (SQF) and then consulting on SQF and BRC it is what we have found.

 

Best to you.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC BUSINESS GROUP | SQF System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
Internal Auditor Training - eConsultant - Pre & Post SQF-GAP Audits - Consultant Training
Visit us @ http://www.GlennOster.com  or call us @ 772.646.4115 US-EST 8am-4pm Anyday except Thursday
 
 

FurFarmandFork

    Food Safety Consultant, Production Supervisor

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,264 posts
  • 585 thanks
194
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon, USA

Posted 12 December 2017 - 03:47 PM

Ditto to SQFConsultant, I find that in compared to other standards, SQF often specifically includes a clause to the tone of "do this, but if you can't, identify controls to make sure that your process/equipment/facility remains safe and effective regardless". In this way it makes you address the hazard, but doesn't necessarily bind you to a specific solution like BRC often does. Heck, half the time for SQF if you can demonstrate compliance with a rule (e.g. storage) and people are trained on it, you can skip an entire "policy" document.


Austin Bouck
Owner/Consultant at Fur, Farm, and Fork.
Consulting for companies needing effective, lean food safety systems and solutions.

Subscribe to the blog at furfarmandfork.com for food safety research, insights, and analysis.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users