Hi,
Can someone tell me why in zone 1 of a environmental monitoring program it is recommend not to test for the pathogen but for indicators. And what is exacltly an indicator (for exemple for salmonella or listeria) ?
Thank you,
Joana
Posted 05 June 2018 - 11:27 AM
Hi,
Can someone tell me why in zone 1 of a environmental monitoring program it is recommend not to test for the pathogen but for indicators. And what is exacltly an indicator (for exemple for salmonella or listeria) ?
Thank you,
Joana
Posted 05 June 2018 - 11:44 AM
An indicator for these would testing total coliforms, fecal coliforms, etc.
MOX agar testing can give possible indicator for Listeria
Zone 1 is food contact surface so you shouldn't be testing for pathogens but the potential indicators. Testing of the pathogens on other zones can be used to determine if zone 1 is possibly contaminated
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted 05 June 2018 - 11:46 AM
Also, as mentioned by other members, testing of zone 1 shouldn't be necessary as the sanitation program should be focusing well on these areas.
Other testing you can perform on zone 1 would include APC and ATP testing
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted 05 June 2018 - 12:02 PM
Hi jofrance67
Live Webinar on 30th April: Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - plus How the FSMA affects HACCP. Also available on Demand.
FSSC 22000 Food Safety Management System for Food Manufacturers Version 6 Implementation Package Out Now !
SQF Code Edition 9 & FSMA Implementation Package for Food Manufacturers - 2023 Update
SQF Implementation Package for Food Manufacturers Edition 9
Videos of the IFSQN Implementation Packages for GFSI benchmarked standards: Introduction How to Use
Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - On Demand. Next Live Webinar on 10th May.
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted 05 June 2018 - 12:52 PM
Hi,
Can someone tell me why in zone 1 of a environmental monitoring program it is recommend not to test for the pathogen but for indicators. And what is exacltly an indicator (for exemple for salmonella or listeria) ?
Thank you,
Joana
Hi Joana,
The following reasons explain some of the advantages of using indicator organisms in an EMP:
1.They are less expensive and save time compared to pathogens.
2. Low prevalence of pathogenic microorganisms limits the practical significance of direct pathogen testing.
3. Indicator microorganisms are high in numbers and can be easily enumerated.
4. Indicator microorganisms are a valid representative of pathogens of concern since indicators use nearly the same pH, nutrients, temperature, water, etc. as that of pathogens.
5. They are non-pathogenic, so there is not a need for sophisticated containment facilities/labs (e.g., Bio Safety Level-2) for sample analysis.
(AIB)
I disagree with No.4 above. Afaik there are no consistently correlatable indicators for Salmonella or L.monocytogenes.
The reason why pathogen testing is not usually done in Zone 1 is somewhat “political” - if tested, the product made on that line must be held until testing results are available.
If zone 1 tests positive for a pathogen, then the product made on that line must be held until further confirmative test results are available, and it will most likely initiate a recall situation. Therefore, it is important to have a predetermined action plan that would be implemented in case of a Salmonella (or any pathogen) positive zone 1. The response team and appropriate management should make a careful decision on disposition of finished product, which is put on hold as a result of zone 1 positive. If possible, the product should be reworked or condemned according to all legal and regulatory procedures.
(AIB)
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users