Dear Tony-C
many thks for the interesting link. I should add that I originally tried to respond to Rosie’s post but googling revealed very,very few claimed-to-be food grade products for me and those were not obviously matched to Rosie’s rather condensed enquiry so I gave up. In my own experience, hv only used corrosion-type additives/cooling waters in locations where no food contact related risk, eg compressors in a workshop although from memory there are some well-known acceptable situations, eg phosphates in steam boilers.
I had a look at the MSDS sheet offered by the producer in yr link. No dispute that the propylene glycol referenced is an approved food additive ( eg
http://www.foodditiv...arch/node/e1520 ) however there is no mention of what the (seemingly substantial) “additional” additives might be. I appreciate this secrecy is not unusual in proprietary products and supplier persistence has often caused me to reject their product out-of-hand despite having claimed food-grade status.
I think it is usual for a claim of “food-grade” to be referenced to an awarding body ? The “not classified as a hazard or environmental hazard under current legislation” looked rather cryptic IMO. Compare the discussed MSDS to this one
http://msds.fmc.com/..._BIOFOAM K.pdf . I presume the UK does hv some classification system for engineering-type compounds analogous to the US, (eg the HD1 etc ratings.)?.
It’s an important topic but meaningful data seems elusive (as usual).
Rgds / Charles.C