1. I would say start with your
CCPs for validation (but don't stop there) but obviously your
CCPs are the key points in your process. Remember as well to validate your decisions for the criticial limits too. I wouldn't do each process step as it doesn't really make sense but...
2. I would validate PRPs as my next task. In an ideal world I'd do this first before enacting the
HACCP plan and before validating the
CCPs but I'm a realist and most PRPs have got some evidence for why they are effective behind them anyway, it's normally a collation exercise to bring it all together. Still, not everyone does this (and you will pass an audit without it from my experience) but it's certainly good practice.
3. I would say it's not necessary to convene the
HACCP team (after all to chose your
CCPs you must have already discussed why they would be effective) but you may consider asking someone independent to validate your
HACCP plan or at least to review the evidence you've collated to look for gaps.
4. Sorry, I'm on maternity leave right now but I use a simple document format for point 1 where I discuss our (only) CCP and choices of critical limits etc with reference to documents supporting our decision. Remember reference to experimental or published work is vital for validation (and obviously keep a copy of these references!) If you have more
CCPs, it might be worth adopting a more tabular format but there will be a significant amount of discussion in this document IMO, some of that might be lifted from your minutes.