Dear Inesa,
Thks. This guy has the most versatile face i hv ever seen.
Regarding yr earlier post. The first part certainly meaningful.

Not so clear about the second.??
Well, I don’t see any specific exclusion of TV performances in the directive although I rather doubt that they come within the intended scope of a FBO. However they can hardly be described as private domestic enterprises also IMHO.
Some (relatively) public, possible, exclusions are mentioned in this Sanco document –
3.8. The occasional handling, preparation, storage and serving of food by private persons
Operations such as the occasional handling, preparation, storage and serving of food by private persons at events such as church, school or village fairs are not covered by the scope of the Regulation. This is made clear in recital 9 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004. The second sentence states that:
"Community rules should only apply to undertakings, the concept of which implies a certain continuity of activities and a certain degree of organisation".
The term “undertaking” is integrated in the definition of a “food business” (in accordance with Article 3(2) of the General Food Law (Regulation (EC) No 178/2002), a “food business” must be an “undertaking”).
Somebody who handles, prepares, stores or serves food occasionally and on a small scale (e.g. a church, school or village fair and other situations such as organised charities comprising individual volunteers where the food is prepared occasionally) cannot be considered as an “undertaking” and is therefore not subject to the requirements of Community hygiene legislation.
The TV “demonstrators” are hardly volunteers but the production is certainly on a small scale from the TV point of view albeit perhaps not ultimately so. I noticed that some TV productions specifically include hygiene tips also which (intentionally / bravely?) invites response similar to those seen in some of the threads on this forum, ie mixed.
I wonder if there is a (general ) regulations disclaimer discreetly added somewhere at the end of all these presentations.? Due diligence.
Regardless of the above, these programs tend to be heavily scrutinised in respect to basic hygiene logics with predictable results. eg see these entertaining links (last two perhaps the most scientific, although the opening quote in main text of barfblog now has certain caveats maybe**) –
http://news.bbc.co.u...ews/2608675.stmhttp://barfblog.food...l-basic-hygiene(+ comments)
http://forums.chef2c...ic.php?t=155634( + a lot of comments)
**
http://www.fda.gov/F...umers/ucm114299 http://answers.yahoo...30102239AAF7fSzRgds / Charles.C