Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Document satisfying the req. of 4.5.1, 4.5.2 and 4.5.3


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

SS2010

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 65 posts
  • 7 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 26 May 2011 - 03:40 AM

Dear FRIENDS,

I have documented procedure to satisfy the documentation requirement of SQF 4.5 which basically says methodology and responsibility of validation and verification of CCPS,QCPS and prerequisites..

I have use all the advice from the friends of this family.

Please review it and give me ur comment whether it is appropriate to satisfy this clause requirement or not.

This is just draft so ur advice will be much appreciated to make it final

Kind Regards,
SS :thumbup:

Attached Files


Edited by SS2010, 26 May 2011 - 03:41 AM.


Thanked by 1 Member:

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,528 posts
  • 1318 thanks
720
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 26 May 2011 - 09:34 PM

Please help by commenting on SS Validation and Verification Plan.


hand-pointing-down.gif
 
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 140 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html

 

recommend-us-on-facebook.png


Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,874 posts
  • 5253 thanks
1,231
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 May 2011 - 01:53 AM

Dear SS2010,

I'm no expert on SQF but just to start the ball rolling -

1. Font too big. Painful to the (my) eye. :smile:
2. I guess it may depend on the case but in another thread, a SQF auditor is of the opinion that micro.testing is not obligatory for verification.
3. Never heard of using mock rats before. Didn't understand the relevance of pest control to "business card" and "coin" ? A bonus activity :smile:
4. Need some more "Validaton and Verification" insertions in the headings. Is not yr No.3 more appropriately captioned as "Validation and Verification of Equipment" ?
5.

Validation and verification of the pre requisites

Is this number "0"?
6.Need definition of verification ? perhaps, together with Validation, nearer the beginning?

Rgds / Charles.C

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

SS2010

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 65 posts
  • 7 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 31 May 2011 - 10:49 PM

Helloooooo

Anyone there!!!!!!!!!

Please seeking for your advice/comments......................

Thanks in advance



Larrauri50

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Mexico
    Mexico

Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:13 PM

in our company we are working to clarify certain point on verification and validation, this is very similar to what you present.

Why not consider the Codex Alimentarius, to validate HACCP and pre-requisites?
For reference there is CAC / GL 68-2008 Guidelines for the validation of control measures for food safety.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users