- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More
Report Accuses EPA of Slanting Analysis
Started by Franco, Dec 06 2005 07:03 AM
1 reply to this topic
#1
Franco
-
- IFSQN Principal
-
- 752 posts
- 15 thanks
Grade - PIFSQN
2
Neutral
Neutral
-
Italy
Posted 06 December 2005 - 07:03 AM
An ancient Chinese proverb teaches that the person who waits for a roast duck to fly into their mouth must wait a very long time.
#2
Charles Chew
-
- IFSQN Fellow
-
- 1,178 posts
- 54 thanks
Grade - FIFSQN
15
Good
Good
-
Malaysia
- Gender:Male
- Location:Malaysia
- Interests:Food, food and food!
Posted 06 December 2005 - 09:40 AM
Well.......ah hummm 
I would certainly look at the uncertainty of measurement in any analytical tests to favour a predetermined objective or preparing the analysis within a limited parameter to potray a skewed result is really quite possible.
Maybe we should take a look at Simon's hazard analysis and turn it into an objective analysis i.e.
a. Does B_sh has anything to do with it?
b. Are any of B_sh's relatives / friends / associates / etc involved in the analysis?
c. Lastly, is there any remote opportunity for any doubt at all?
If answer is "Yes" to any one of the above - the analysis result is skewed and therefoe no longer valid. 
Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
