Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

AIB Scoring system

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic
- - - - -

D-D

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 239 posts
  • 55 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 January 2013 - 01:18 PM

Can anyone please explain how AIB scoring is done? The attached image is a table from an actual audit report but I have no idea how they get to the Scores.

Looking at the first row, for example, you might think you lose 10 points for each Improvement Needed: 200 - (4x10) = 160. However, this doesn't add up on the next row where there are 6 Improvement Needed plus 2 Minor Issues and yet the score is the same, 160.

Attached Files


  • 0

D-D

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 239 posts
  • 55 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 January 2013 - 01:57 PM

Never mind; I think I have found it on page ix / Table 2 of the current standard. A bit of a weird system but anyway...
Can someone delete this tread please?


  • 0

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,874 posts
  • 1366 thanks
907
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 25 January 2013 - 03:32 PM

I think we'll leave it D-D, just in case any other member seeks the same.

Have a nice weekend.

Regards,
Simon


  • 0

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users