Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Your opinions on MAN as Root Cause and 'No Blame Policy'

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

Zeeshan

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 499 posts
  • 225 thanks
25
Excellent

  • Pakistan
    Pakistan
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Karachi, Pakistan
  • Interests:QMS, TQM, FSMS, HMS (Halal Management System), IMS (Integrated Management System), Training Programs Management, Performance Management

Posted 17 December 2013 - 08:14 AM

Dear Members,

 

What is your personal opinion about tagging causes to MAN while doing root cause analysis under 'No blame policy'. If I am going to follow a 'no blame policy', I should tag all the causes to either 'Machine', 'Material', 'Method', ........ but not 'Man'.

 

Hope not inducing confusions about traditional 4M Concept ????? :shutup:

 

Zeeshan.


  • 0

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,935 posts
  • 1374 thanks
929
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 17 December 2013 - 09:43 AM

Hello Zeeshan,

In a robust and joined up root cause analysis process MAN is very much a valid cause, even under a No Blame Policy.  However, it is another MAN who is responsible for solving the issue MANagement.

 

Attached File  fishbone.jpg   50.33KB   12 downloads

 

 


  • 0

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users