Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Stuck on finding any hazards with the Hammer Mill

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic
- - - - -

dustishere

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 10 posts
  • 4 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 05 January 2014 - 08:43 PM

Hi, I am doing a hazard analysis chart for our plant right now, and im stuck on finding any hazards with the hammer mill. Like Physical, Biological and Chemical hazards.  Our auditor insist I must find the hazards and preventive measures because I have the hammer mill in our flowchart. Thanks for any advice.


  • 0

YongYM

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 231 posts
  • 58 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Reading, Watching TV, Singing Karaoke & Sight-seeing

Posted 06 January 2014 - 06:06 AM

To dustihere:

 

Any possibility of pathogenic microorganism due to improper cleaning (dead spot that is hard to clean) , physical metal powder or metal fragment due to wear-and-tear of the hammer mill, lubricant (using lubricant?) from the hammer mill etc.?

 

Yong


  • 0

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5705 thanks
1,554
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 07 January 2014 - 05:00 AM

Dear dustishere,

 

Do you have a metal detector near the end of yr process ?

 

These are generically very popular with auditors where metallic process equipment is concerned. :smile:

 

If no budget for a MD, as per previous post,  you may have to validate from a risk evaluation that there simply is no significant hazard, eg metal contamination.

 

Rgds / Charles.C


  • 0

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


dustishere

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 10 posts
  • 4 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 08 January 2014 - 02:17 PM

Dear dustishere,

 

Do you have a metal detector near the end of yr process ?

 

These are generically very popular with auditors where metallic process equipment is concerned. :smile:

 

If no budget for a MD, as per previous post,  you may have to validate from a risk evaluation that there simply is no significant hazard, eg metal contamination.

 

Rgds / Charles.C

 

We have 4 grate magnets throughout the processing post hammer mill


  • 0

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5705 thanks
1,554
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 08 January 2014 - 07:10 PM

We have 4 grate magnets throughout the processing post hammer mill

Dear dustishere,

 

You seem to have answered yr own OP wit a CCP. :thumbup:

 

(assuming you can validate the effectiveness of the last metal grate which i assume is the (most/joint equal most) sensitive and is located such that no subsequent significant risk of metallic contamination exists )

 

Rgds Charles.C


  • 0

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,892 posts
  • 1462 thanks
800
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 09 January 2014 - 04:09 AM

Hi, I am doing a hazard analysis chart for our plant right now, and im stuck on finding any hazards with the hammer mill. Like Physical, Biological and Chemical hazards.  Our auditor insist I must find the hazards and preventive measures because I have the hammer mill in our flowchart. Thanks for any advice.

 

Hi Dustihere,

 

Can you post a process flow diagram as I think that will help.

 

Regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. 

Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.

Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.


DP2006

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 65 posts
  • 21 thanks
4
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 January 2014 - 07:19 AM

In terms of "dead spots" in the hammer mill, depending on the nature of the products you are handling, I would certainly consider the effects of chemical hazards eg is there a food safety risk from a product 1 if it gets into another batch of the same product (thereby increasing the concentration to an unacceptable level) or is there a risk if product 1 gets into product 2 causing a cross-contamination risk?

 

Where you have dead spots in a powder handling process, there is always the possibility of material "hang up" and a "clump" of product might subsequently drop into product you don't want it to.

 

In terms of chemical hazards you might also want to think about mycotoxins if you are handling cereals / flour.

 

Good Luck!

DP2006


  • 0



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users