3 replies to this topic

[hsidhu]

In clause 4.9.2.1 we suppose to have sharp metal policy in place. Does this policy needs to be supported by a daily checklist to prove that all the tools are accountable or a general policy will work that out. Because we are not using any those tools at food contact surfaces, onle short knives are being used to open packaginds.

[Charles.C]

In clause 4.9.2.1 we suppose to have sharp metal policy in place. Does this policy needs to be supported by a daily checklist to prove that all the tools are accountable or a general policy will work that out. Because we are not using any those tools at food contact surfaces, onle short knives are being used to open packaginds.

4.9.2.1 where ??

 

Regardless the answer is yes to first part of second sentence.

 

Rgds / Charles.C

[Simon]

I think it's BRC Charles...

 

Have you taken a look ->here<- hsidhu

[Slab]

It's BRC;

 

4.9.2.1

"There shall be a documented policy for the control of the use of sharp metal implements

including knives, cutting blades on equipment, needles and wires. This shall include a record

of inspection for damage and the investigation of any lost items. Snap-off blade knives shall

not be used."

 

 

Here is another thread on the topic;

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...st-not-be-used/

 

And to answer your question, hsidhu, it may depend on the step in the process and what packaging are being opened and tools used.  The guidance is a bit vague with BRC so it would be best to avoid too much scrutiny and establish an edged utensil register and policy outlining procedures.