Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

FSSC Mock Recall / Traceability Exercise

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic
* * - - - 1 votes

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,856 posts
  • 1451 thanks
792
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 29 May 2014 - 06:28 PM

No you can't recall more than 100% of the batch of ingredient but if it's an ingredient your not going to recall that ingredient you have to recall all of the product it made.  That's why when I wrote up my explanation I said we had to trace the affected ingredient to all of the product it made.

 

I think we are just talking different angles of the same thing Tony.  We are both not wrong :happydance:

 

Hi I'm a Mr-E,

 

The forums are about opinion and debate which is healthy and I do like a good debate :sleazy:

 

Assuming we are talking about Mock Recall and a Traceability Exercise?:

 

In terms of FSSC 22000 specific requirements there shouldn't be a problem.

 

The difference is possibly that I am used to applying more stringent measures to a recall and traceability procedure and the acceptable results.

 

Best practice (which ISO 22000 requires) is a proper mass balance so hopefully members don't think that finding 114% of the ingredient is acceptable in a recall when in reality it should not be more than 100% unless it has been under dosed. Recalling 114% of the finished product isn't a problem.

 

As your post is titled Mock Recall/Traceability Exercise I assume that you wanted to achieve both, maybe your posts cover the first part adequately but not the second?

 

I look forward to your response!

 

Regards,

 

Tony


Edited by Tony-C, 29 May 2014 - 06:29 PM.

  • 0

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. 

Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.

Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.


Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,625 posts
  • 267 thanks
177
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 29 May 2014 - 08:46 PM

Hi I'm a Mr-E,

 

...The difference is possibly that I am used to applying more stringent measures to a recall and traceability procedure and the acceptable results.

 

Best practice (which ISO 22000 requires) is a proper mass balance so hopefully members don't think that finding 114% of the ingredient is acceptable in a recall when in reality it should not be more than 100% unless it has been under dosed. Recalling 114% of the finished product isn't a problem....

 

 

 

Good point.  It is easy to confuse the two issues. 


  • 0
Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users