- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More
Specific regulations on humidity for a crab processing room
Started by Ahmad123, Aug 15 2014 07:45 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 15 August 2014 - 07:45 AM
hello, I work at crab canning factory, and I have been encountered by some question about relative humidity. is there any regulation for minimum relative humidity?how do can I find it?. I have been looking for the information for minimum RH for picking room but i havent found it yet.
#2
Posted 15 August 2014 - 05:14 PM
I have never personally come across any specific regulations relating to RH- are you looking at this from a personnel perspective or from a product safetyquality one?
In various food production areas I have come across anything from 20% to 70% as an 'in house' requirement (depending on ambient temperature, product. process etc)
I believe it is accepted that below 25% RH staff have problems/discomfort with drying of mucous membranes and above 70% their ability to regulate body temperature through sweating is seriously compromised
I have the below saved on my computer- apologies- I have no idea where i got it from (or indeed it's validity!)-but it gives an idea of range!
Sugar Storage 20 - 35%
Breweries 35 - 45%
Coffee Powder 30 - 40%
Milk Powder Storage 20 - 35%
Seed Storage 35 - 45%
Unpacked Medicine 20 - 35%
Rust Resistance Below 40%
Medical Syrups 30 - 40%
Capsule Storage 30 - 45%
Powder Storage 30 - 45%
kind regards
Mike
Edited by Mike Green, 15 August 2014 - 05:18 PM.
I may sound like a complete idiot...but actually there are a couple of bits missing
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#3
Posted 15 August 2014 - 06:19 PM
I believe it is accepted that below 25% RH staff have problems/discomfort with drying of mucous membranes.......
In the American Southwest, if gets above 10% people start complaining about the humidity....
as they say it's a dry heat.... ![]()
Live Long & Prosper
#4
Posted 16 August 2014 - 02:06 AM
I have never personally come across any specific regulations relating to RH- are you looking at this from a personnel perspective or from a product safetyquality one?
In various food production areas I have come across anything from 20% to 70% as an 'in house' requirement (depending on ambient temperature, product. process etc)
I believe it is accepted that below 25% RH staff have problems/discomfort with drying of mucous membranes and above 70% their ability to regulate body temperature through sweating is seriously compromised
I have the below saved on my computer- apologies- I have no idea where i got it from (or indeed it's validity!)-but it gives an idea of range!
Sugar Storage 20 - 35%
Breweries 35 - 45%
Coffee Powder 30 - 40%
Milk Powder Storage 20 - 35%
Seed Storage 35 - 45%
Unpacked Medicine 20 - 35%
Rust Resistance Below 40%
Medical Syrups 30 - 40%
Capsule Storage 30 - 45%
Powder Storage 30 - 45%
kind regards
Mike
thanks mike,
well, actually i am looking at both perspective. but it is kind a tough to find RH for specific product and condition. i will consider those "20%-70%" for next validation.
ahmad
#5
Posted 16 August 2014 - 09:22 AM
Not sure whether you have seen these seafood processing/ canning related resources from FAO?
http://www.fao.org/p...bmluZw==&page=2
I haven't had a chance to review them- (there are quite a few documents!)-so not sure of their relevance to your issue - but you may find something useful therein!
Mike
I may sound like a complete idiot...but actually there are a couple of bits missing
#6
Posted 17 August 2014 - 03:01 AM
Not sure whether you have seen these seafood processing/ canning related resources from FAO?
http://www.fao.org/p...bmluZw==&page=2
I haven't had a chance to review them- (there are quite a few documents!)-so not sure of their relevance to your issue - but you may find something useful therein!
Mike
Dear Mike Green,
Some goldem oldies, thks.
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









