Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Artificial Sweetners

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Rashid

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

Posted 26 January 2006 - 10:39 AM

Dear fellows
I am a new entrent and wish to be the part of the forum. Well, any body out there would help me for the selection of artificial sweetners in the context of its saftey and compatibility in bakery products especialy cookies. Although I had tried Sucralose but its very much expensive. So any body knows any other sweetner that cost less and show greater compatibility interm of saftey and tehcical profile.

Thanks

Rashid



Hongyun

    Finger Lickin' Good

  • IFSQN Member
  • 241 posts
  • 20 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Singapore
    Singapore
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 12 August 2006 - 02:13 PM

Was broswing the forum and saw this post. Think you might already gotten the info you need since it's been so long. Anyhow, to the others that might be interested in the data of different kinds of sugar substitutes, pls see the attached file.

FYI



"World Community Grid made it possible for us to analyze in one day the number of specimens that would take approximately 130 years to complete using a traditional computer."

- Dr. David J. Foran, professor and lead researcher at The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.




Join our LinkedIn Group! >> <<

mrfoodlaw

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 9 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral
  • Location:london

Posted 15 August 2006 - 01:40 PM

Dear fellows
I am a new entrent and wish to be the part of the forum. Well, any body out there would help me for the selection of artificial sweetners in the context of its saftey and compatibility in bakery products especialy cookies. Although I had tried Sucralose but its very much expensive. So any body knows any other sweetner that cost less and show greater compatibility interm of saftey and tehcical profile.

Thanks

Rashid


Hi Rachid,

Sounds like you want a thermally stable intense sweetener (aspartame for example has poor thermal stability, acesulfame is more stable, not too sure about the combined salt - worth checking)
combined with a bulk sweetener for textural purposes, one of the sugar alcohols for example xylitol for example. The bulk sweeteners typically have a sweetness of 40-90% that of sugar depending on that used and do have some calorific value though not as much of course as sugar. they have much the same physical characteristics upon cooking. Worth mentioning that if you use >10% polyol in your formulation (present as sold in final product) you will need a laxative warning (at least in the EU, not sure about other markets) so worth bearing in mind. A mixture of polydextrose and intense sweetener might be something to consider too - no laxative warning for polydextrose

Hope this helps!


Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,840 posts
  • 1364 thanks
885
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 15 August 2006 - 08:01 PM

Thanks for chipping in guys. :clap:

Rashid are you still around?


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users