Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Please review my HACCP Plan

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic
- - - - -

sarah2014

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 103 posts
  • 12 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 23 May 2016 - 12:31 PM

Hello,

Attcach a  HACCP plan, asking if possible I can get your help to change or add

 

 

many thanks in advance

 



Thanked by 2 Members:

trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 23 May 2016 - 03:42 PM

Call me old fashioned , but...... It is my understanding that each step of the process must be riak assessed for the following hazards:

Biological - Pathogen, growth

              -

 

 

When I was at the advanced HACCP training course a couple of years ago they gave us the format attached.


I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

Thanked by 3 Members:

trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 23 May 2016 - 03:46 PM

Feck... I poster that and didn't mean to

 

Biological - Pathogen contamination

                Pathogen growth

                Pathogen survival

 

Chemical - Oils or greases from equipment

                 Cleaning chemical residues

                Antibiotics.

 

Physical -  People, premises, plant, Pests, packaging

 

Allergens - any one of the 13 listed in EU.

 

 

Here is the template we were given.


I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

Thanked by 2 Members:

trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 23 May 2016 - 03:48 PM

Feckity feck I did it again

Attached Files


I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

Thanked by 2 Members:

QAGB

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 685 posts
  • 262 thanks
115
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 23 May 2016 - 07:52 PM

 

Hello,

Attcach a  HACCP plan, asking if possible I can get your help to change or add

 

 

many thanks in advance

 

 

Hi Sarah,

 

I agree with Trubert. You should have Biological, Chemical, and Physical hazards listed for each step; even if there are none. You do have a very thorough analysis though.

 

So as an example, in your shipping step according to the excel file:

 

  • Biological - Pests, Microbial Growth (Yeast & Mold) from degraded materials and/or improper storage.
  • Chemical - None
  • Physical - Damage to the Container (foreign substance introduced to the material).

 

QAGB



Thanked by 2 Members:

shruti

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 3 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 24 May 2016 - 02:55 AM

Dear,

 

HACCP not means just use a fixed  format and work as fixed way. For applying HACCP for any product the simplest ways are as follow-

 

1.Just collect the scientific knowledge about the product.

2.Do risk assessment on each steps.

3.Control measure for each risk.

4.Than categorize the control measures as ccp or Oprp.

 

And format is not important for HACCP.

 

thank you

 

sunil mishra



Thanked by 2 Members:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 24 May 2016 - 08:16 AM

Hi sarah,

 

Product / process ?

 

Any particular FS standard ? ISO/fssc ?

 

Actually i thought the basic layout is getting there ( but maybe depending on the Standard)  but the Risk Assessment is confused.

.

To reiterate somewhat -

 

Attached File  Hazards.png   135.37KB   48 downloads

 

 

 


 


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 2 Members:

Jewl578

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 28 posts
  • 7 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 May 2016 - 11:59 AM

Right or wrong, we added allergens along with the Biological, chemical and physical.

Auditors seem to like the idea.

 

JB



Thanked by 2 Members:

sarah2014

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 103 posts
  • 12 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 May 2016 - 12:07 PM

Thank you all i will work on it 



Thanked by 1 Member:

Jean Carmona

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 66 posts
  • 2 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 14 September 2018 - 11:55 AM

 

Hi sarah,

 

Product / process ?

 

Any particular FS standard ? ISO/fssc ?

 

Actually i thought the basic layout is getting there ( but maybe depending on the Standard)  but the Risk Assessment is confused.

.

To reiterate somewhat -

 

attachicon.gif Hazards.png

 

 

 

Mr. Charles, may I know where did you get this picture from? seems that the document has a lot of good information that I'm in need right now.

 

Appreciate it!



Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 15 September 2018 - 06:16 AM

 

Mr. Charles, may I know where did you get this picture from? seems that the document has a lot of good information that I'm in need right now.

 

Appreciate it!

 

 

Hi Jean,

 

Sorry, was 2 years ago, can't remember the source.

 

You could try copying the first line of text and googling. Often works for me.

 

Added - See Next Post


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 15 September 2018 - 12:45 PM

addendum

 

It appeared, maybe originally, in this text -

 

Attached File  guidelines on haccp.GMP,ASEAN food,manual - haccp_en.pdf   1.97MB   125 downloads

(Pg 83)

 

And, presumably borrowed, in other later documents -

 

Attached File  development of haccp plan for soy-based foods.pdf   2.22MB   118 downloads

(pg 275)


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 2 Members:

Brendan Triplett

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 511 posts
  • 131 thanks
106
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Rugby, Military History, Reading

Posted 16 September 2018 - 02:09 AM

Hey Sarah,

 

Here is a quick template shot of what we use for our risks.  We do more distribution and third party logistics so it is not by ingredient or anything but you can get the basic idea from this.  Hope it helps. 

 

Attached File  Hazard Analysis Receiving.docx   19.36KB   176 downloads

 

Cheers!


Vice President and SQF Practitioner in Pennsylvania
Brendan Triplett


Thanked by 3 Members:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 24 December 2018 - 06:17 AM

Hey Sarah,

 

Here is a quick template shot of what we use for our risks.  We do more distribution and third party logistics so it is not by ingredient or anything but you can get the basic idea from this.  Hope it helps. 

 

attachicon.gif Hazard Analysis Receiving.docx

 

Cheers!

 

Hi Brendan,

 

Just noticed the above.

 

Useful Layout, Thks. (I presume FSMA oriented)

 

I guess  "FSRAM" = "FS risk assessment matrix"  but how to  interpret the data in risk eval. columns (eg "2...D...12") ??


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

liyana_d

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia

Posted 09 January 2019 - 02:48 AM

Hi.

I am not sure which risk asseement matrix did Brendan used to interprete the hazard severity and likelihood, but I am using the FS risk assessment matrix from this link

http://www.correcttr...nd_ccp_tree.pdf . The numbers looks similar to the one shared by Brendan, but this has its interpretation in it.

 

Good luck :)



Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 09 January 2019 - 06:38 AM

Hi.

I am not sure which risk asseement matrix did Brendan used to interprete the hazard severity and likelihood, but I am using the FS risk assessment matrix from this link

http://www.correcttr...nd_ccp_tree.pdf . The numbers looks similar to the one shared by Brendan, but this has its interpretation in it.

 

Good luck :)

 

Hi liyana,

 

thks for input.

 

As i understand, cells above the (safety) line >  CCPs. Far too rigid IMO.

 

I also don't agree with the use of "generic" recall/complaint titles as appropriate for safety severities.

 

However risk matrices are indisputably subjective. :smile:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users