- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More
Universal Food Safety System for the World
Started by safefood007, May 26 2016 01:20 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 26 May 2016 - 01:20 PM
Why not all the worldwide food safety systems combine and make a one universal food safety system? After that no BRC, HACCP, FSSC 22000, SQF etc. Now a days world is global village then why this global village has too much food safety systems?
#2
Posted 26 May 2016 - 02:03 PM
GFSI are attempting to create equivalence amongst 3rd party food safety certification standards. It s long road and a big job.
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#3
Posted 28 May 2016 - 02:18 PM
best wishes for future.
#4
Posted 03 June 2016 - 12:53 PM
On my opinion, very far away from real world.
People from Germany (IFS) wont´t ever think as people from UK (BRC).
Sorry....
Leila
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#5
Posted 03 June 2016 - 01:59 PM
On my opinion, very far away from real world.
People from Germany (IFS) wont´t ever think as people from UK (BRC).
Sorry....
Leila
Hi Leila,
KO versus Due Diligence ?
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#6
Posted 03 June 2016 - 05:30 PM
Hello Charles,
No. KO vs Fundamental is ok,
My point of view is how is the structure of both standards: BRC is a bullet point of compliance, IFS is more open - and retail service perspective
Leila
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#7
Posted 03 June 2016 - 05:36 PM
Hello Charles,
No. KO vs Fundamental is ok,
My point of view is how is the structure of both standards: BRC is a bullet point of compliance, IFS is more open - and retail service perspective
Leila
Hi Leila,
I believe you.
I tried to read the IFS standard once and gave up with my head spinning. i always thought BRC was confusing but ........
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#9
Posted 03 June 2016 - 08:04 PM
Why not all the worldwide food safety systems combine and make a one universal food safety system? After that no BRC, HACCP, FSSC 22000, SQF etc. Now a days world is global village then why this global village has too much food safety systems?
Monopolizing any system is not a great idea. One, there are far too many political, socioeconomic, and cultural boundaries to negotiate with that in mind. Two, there is entirely too much money involved with certification.
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#10
Posted 04 June 2016 - 09:51 AM
Hello Slab,
Very agreeable...certification is too costly. It is almost always a market-driven.
regards,
redfox
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










