Hello All,
Tomorrow June 8-9 is our BRC7 Audit. Thanks to IFSQN community that untirely gives their support to all members.
Regards,
redfox
Posted 07 June 2016 - 09:42 AM
Hello All,
Tomorrow June 8-9 is our BRC7 Audit. Thanks to IFSQN community that untirely gives their support to all members.
Regards,
redfox
Posted 07 June 2016 - 09:51 AM
Good luck!
************************************************
25 years in food. And it never gets easier.
Posted 07 June 2016 - 10:51 AM
Ditto !
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 08 June 2016 - 11:17 PM
All the best and hope you are well prepared.
Posted 09 June 2016 - 05:56 AM
Let us know how you get on Redfox.
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
Posted 10 June 2016 - 03:44 AM
Hello everybody,
We finished our BRC7 audit yesterday. We escaped with B grade. No major all minors NCs.
Findings ranges from packing step must be included in our HACCP, pest control, air monitoring, risk assessment on packaging material and ingredients, pest control, metal control, specification of rawmat, packaging and ingredient that will used during receiving of deliveries. Contract with the suppliers of services such as testing laboratories, calibrators and etc.
Suppliers of rawmat, packaging and services performance is monitored but no criteria how to rate/grade them so that a risk the site can identify who is good or bad supplier based on the evaluation from the monitoring.
If you are buying from trader, the product must be identified from the last manufacturer.
We got NC on our mechanical rat trap coz we use biscuit for bait. But ironically it attracts ants.
Air direction must be from inside.
No outdated calibration certificate for the equipment that needs calibration.
Hope this will guide you on your future audit.
Regards,
redfox
.
Posted 10 June 2016 - 05:53 AM
Thanks for letting us know Redfox, not too bad. Some work to do but at least you will not need another audit for 12 months.
Kind regards,
Tony
Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Live Webinar next Friday May 09, 2025
Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording.
Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here
Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages:
Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here
Posted 10 June 2016 - 12:31 PM
Hi Redfox,
As I understand this was yr second BRC audit so far. Product presumably still canned, chilled, crabmeat.
I'm curious, were the items like absence of calibration certificates a carry-over from first audit ? ie predicted NCs.
Did the auditor have much interest in Vulnerability Assessment ? (maybe not if all locally caught material)
Hopefully the results improved upon 1st time.
Personally i like Good "B"s but Top Management will not of course.
Well done !
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 10 June 2016 - 12:54 PM
Hello Charles,
We have temperature measuring devices that the calibration were expired last week. Very unfortunate that the new item that has just been calibrated arrived late. Yes the auditor is very interested in EMA Vulnerability Assessment. The risk assessment that I presented is combination from Campden, BRI, and BRC published article. I rate it low risk so that the auditor wont look for any control measure to mitigate the risk.
regards,
redfox
Posted 10 June 2016 - 01:07 PM
Hello Charles,
We have temperature measuring devices that the calibration were expired last week. Very unfortunate that the new item that has just been calibrated arrived late. Yes the auditor is very interested in EMA Vulnerability Assessment. The risk assessment that I presented is combination from Campden, BRI, and BRC published article. I rate it low risk so that the auditor wont look for any control measure to mitigate the risk.
regards,
redfox
Hi Redfox,
Thanks.
Yes, I suppose (assuming supply chain = boat/sea), should be a fairly low vulnerability for fraud, other than species perhaps.
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users