Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
- - - - -

Nesting Ingredient Containers

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 ELarson


    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks

  • United States
    United States

Posted 24 February 2017 - 02:55 PM

I am the QA supervisor at a RTE facility and need some opinions/suggestions.

Sanitation and production employees have been nesting our 55 gallon containers that we use to store open raw materials or WIP in.

Should we eliminate the practice of nesting these, using liners between the containers if they are nested or stack them on top of each other with their lids in-between.  They are being nested after they are cleaned and sanitized. My fear is that employees will pull them apart and place on floor and then potentially nest back together.  Please see attached Picture of nested ingredient containers.

Attached Files

#2 FurFarmandFork


    QA Manager/FS Blogger

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,091 posts
  • 490 thanks

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 24 February 2017 - 04:45 PM

That's a tough one, because just "enforcing the behavior" isn't a good foolproof solution to the scenario you described.


You could use a blanket policy of "once it's been de-nested, it's dirty", but I imagine you would nest dirty ones on their way back to sanitation as well, and has the issue I just mentioned of not being foolproof.


I don't think the liners solves your problem, and one issue I've seen with "nested" materials in the past is that if they're stacked wet, even if clean, they'll stay wet and grow mold in storage.


My solution would be to choose one of two policies:


1. No nesting unless dirty (this way they can be nested in storage as long as they're cleaned and sanitized before use), and all nested materials will be considered "dirty" and unusable, eliminating your scenario.

2. No nesting at all.


I chose the latter for 5g buckets in my facility, either they would get stacked wet and have the problems above, or it became hard to differentiate what was clean and dirty.



QA Manager and food safety blogger in Oregon, USA.


Interested in more information on food safety and science? Check out Furfarmandfork.com for more insights!

Subscribe to have one post per week delivered straight to your inbox.


#3 Ryan M.

Ryan M.

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 474 posts
  • 202 thanks

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham, AL
  • Interests:Reading, crosswords, passionate discussions, laughing at US politics.

Posted 28 February 2017 - 07:05 PM

The fear you have is only one aspect of the risk.  If they are nested before they fully dry then you can have microbial activity, especially if they do not fully clean the outside/exterior surfaces.


As a good practice nesting of ingredient/product containers should be eliminated.  I would even go as far as eliminating nesting of sanitation buckets; I have seen a number of facilities nest these without realizing the potential hazards.

#4 SQFconsultant



  • IFSQN Principal
  • 919 posts
  • 197 thanks

  • Panama
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:We specialize in helping small to mid-sized food, logistic and packaging companies to develop & implement SQF Systems to achieve certification in a relatively short period of time. In addition we offer a low-cost highly effective eConsultant Subscription, SQF Compliance Reviews and Internal Auditor Training. Don't let our location throw you off - Our market is the United States.
    Call us to discuss your needs 800-546-1452

Posted 28 February 2017 - 07:21 PM

The facility we have in process does not allow nesting regardless of size for the very reason that Ryan pointed out and as consultants we just saw a company have a micro issue due to stacking.

Warm regards,


Glenn Oster


SQF Certification & Implementation Consultant

Serving clients in: USA, Centro America & Caribbean Islands

International Toll-Free: 800-546-1452

USA Skype Number: 772-646-4115



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

EV SSL Certificate