- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More
Enterobacteriaceae indicator- raw chicken
Started by kbuchanan, Aug 19 2017 02:14 PM
1 reply to this topic
#1
Posted 19 August 2017 - 02:14 PM
Hello, hope you can help with a quick query. i'm looking for microbial guideline limits for enterobactericeae levels in raw chicken? Does anyone have a reference for this? My understanding is that this can only give an indication of hygiene on the day of production but that because of the presence of psychrophilic enterobacteriaceae which multiply during refrigeration and storage, that it is not a great indicator to use for this matrix, and so there is not a guideline usually set. Is that right? Many thanks
#2
Posted 20 August 2017 - 04:43 AM
Hello, hope you can help with a quick query. i'm looking for microbial guideline limits for enterobactericeae levels in raw chicken? Does anyone have a reference for this? My understanding is that this can only give an indication of hygiene on the day of production but that because of the presence of psychrophilic enterobacteriaceae which multiply during refrigeration and storage, that it is not a great indicator to use for this matrix, and so there is not a guideline usually set. Is that right? Many thanks
Hi kbuchanan,
Most related comments / data is based on carcass measurements. Geographic locations vary in opinion.
JFI I enclose a few samples.
There are also psychrotrophic Enterobacteriaceae that are able to multiply in chilled foods. These are
widely distributed and found in a variety of foods including milk, meat and poultry. This makes it
difficult to interpret levels found throughout the shelf life of a chilled food as they do not necessarily
reflect initial contamination levels or whether temperature control has been adequate.
Enterobacteriaceae do provide an indication of processing and good hygiene on the day of
production.
(indc1)
Enterobacteriaceae are also used as a hygiene indicator for food including fresh meat and, for
example, EU Regulation No 2073/2005 includes a Enterobacteriaceae process hygiene criterion for
carcasses of cattle, sheep, goat, horses and pigs. However, E. coli is often considered a more specific
indicator for faecal contamination (Craven et al., 2003; Baylis et al., 2006). This is because certain
psychrotrophic strains of Enterobacteriaceae may multiply in meat and the Enterobacteriaceae also
includes bacteria that are not always of faecal origin. By comparison, E. coli is generally of faecal
origin, and growth of this organism under refrigeration conditions remains minimal (Baylis et al.,
2006).
(indc2)
Enterobacteriaceae, a hygiene indicator were also part of the microflora of chicken meat (Fig.5). The Initial population of Enterobacteriaceae (3.27log CFU/g) is indicative of adequate hygiene conditions of production in the poultry plant.
(indc3)
FSIS poultry carcass process hygiene E.coli limits.png 104.35KB
3 downloads
(indc4)
There is very little scientific evidence for the establishment of the current microbiological criteria particularly in regards to the Enterobacteriaceae and its impact on animal and public health – i.e. what absolute limit (M) is appropriate to protect human and animal health?
(DEFRA,ABP materials,UK,2012)
indc1 - A-NZ, Food.Standards - Compendium of Microbiological Criteria,2016.pdf 1.02MB
34 downloads
indc2 - EFSA Indicators for poultry meat inspection,2012.pdf 2.11MB
28 downloads
indc3 - Chicken meat quality, Enterobacteriaceae,2015.pdf 672.67KB
46 downloads
indc4 - FSIS Micro. Sampling-Testing Raw-Poultry,2015.pdf 293.58KB
41 downloads
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
|
Thanked by 2 Members:
|
,
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users






