Hi Simon,
Whether the sudden desire to push for product traceability is aimed towards food terrorism is not relevant. In fact, the sheer need of a good product recovery / traceability system itself is pertinent.
Taking the cue from the core issues mentioned in the article, it appears necessary to have a fully functional traceability plan (a system) versus the methods used in ensuring the effectiveness of a recovery when ensued (i.e. radio frequency tagging is only but a hardware)
How do we know that we have an effective traceability system? Does our mock recall exercises really allows us to penetrate stock recovery right down to the trade levels or are we doing just enough to please the food auditor's requirements for recertification.
Can some one share with us a good hazard assessment program / method to justify a stock recovery and if justified, how best the traceability approach be taken to have maximum effectiveness.
Cheers!
Charles Chew