Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Model for Evaluation of Verification Results

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

Ashfaq Hussain

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 60 posts
  • 6 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Pakistan
    Pakistan
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Panjab, Lahore
  • Interests:Food safety and Quality.
    HACCP/ PRP & oPRP.
    Pest management and chemical handling.
    Operation and supply chain.

Posted 25 August 2018 - 03:42 AM

Good Morning All,

 

Any have model for evaluation of verification results.

 

“Trends analysis for the monitoring records temperature logger data though reviewed on a daily basis during production routine not found considered by food safety team”

 

Looking for your support,

 

Regards,

Ashfaq Hussain



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 25 August 2018 - 03:55 AM

Need Context..

 

Clause ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 25 August 2018 - 04:04 AM

addendum

 

Please note that you currently have 5 abandoned threads.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Ashfaq Hussain

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 60 posts
  • 6 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Pakistan
    Pakistan
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Panjab, Lahore
  • Interests:Food safety and Quality.
    HACCP/ PRP & oPRP.
    Pest management and chemical handling.
    Operation and supply chain.

Posted 25 August 2018 - 09:47 AM

Need Context..

 

Clause ?

 

 

Dear Charles,

 

Please note:

BRC Issue 7

FSSC 2008

IFS Ver. 6

   

3.7.2

8.4.3

1.4.2

 

 

 “Trends in monitoring results that may indicate development toward loss of control”

Moreover, the performance trending data are tabulated and reported in the scheduled annual review (SPI) to demonstrate effectiveness of the quality management system.

 

Regards,

Ashfaq Hussain



FurFarmandFork

    Food Safety Consultant, Production Supervisor

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,264 posts
  • 590 thanks
206
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon, USA

Posted 25 August 2018 - 01:36 PM

Taking a guess that you got in trouble for having monitoring records but food safety team does not review/verify them independently?

 

At the end of each production run, myself or my tech reviews all records for completeness and/or strange data and adds a signature. For some quantitative checks, we independently maintain a spreadsheet of the recordings so we can watch trends. Does that help?


Austin Bouck
Owner/Consultant at Fur, Farm, and Fork.
Consulting for companies needing effective, lean food safety systems and solutions.

Subscribe to the blog at furfarmandfork.com for food safety research, insights, and analysis.



Share this


Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Evaluation, Verification Results, Trends analysis

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users