Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Pathogen Specification - FDA Regulation

Non - RTE Foods

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 BALA Prasanna

BALA Prasanna

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 10 March 2019 - 09:55 AM

Hi Team,

               I already share my product category. (Our Products is Non RTE Category (Milled Grain with Spices & processed Vegetables)

 

Can any one help the pathogen specification for following microbes (as per FDA norms).

 

Bacillus cereus                        -   1000 CFU/g

Clostridium perfringenes         -    500 CFU/g

Staphylococcus aureus           -   1000 CFU/g

Clostridium botulinum              -   Negative/g

E.coli (Pathogenic)                  -    Negative/g

Salmonella                              -    Negative/g

Listeria monocytogenes          -    Negative/g

 

Is there any changes required?



#2 Slab

Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 353 posts
  • 174 thanks
68
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heel of the Boot
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted 10 March 2019 - 02:33 PM

The FDA establishes action levels for pathogens when one or more organism is present in a 25/g sample. "Adulterated" by definition of 21 CFR is generally considered the presence of pathogens, filth, foreign matter, etc under federal food code regulations. I'm sure there is some exception to the term 'adulterated' that may or not be regulated by the FDA, but I would not even begin to guess what those exceptions are.

 

Here is a non-binding draft for 21 CFR part 121  Attached File  PCHF-Guidance-Chapter-3_01-17-2018.pdf   334.37KB   47 downloads which lists the following:

 

  • Bacillus cereus 
  • Campylobacter jejuni 
  • Clostridium botulinum 
  • Clostridium perfringens 
  • Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli such as O157:H7 
  • Listeria monocytogenes  
  • Salmonella spp
  • Shigella spp
  • Staphylococcus aureus 

 

 

The only reference for Staph A. is in regards to action levels is the presence of enterotoxin, or presence of organism 10^4/g (MPN) that i can find is in Appendix 5, Table A-5 Seafood Hazards Guidance:

 

 

Attached File  Appendix 5 FDA and EPA Safety Levels in Regulations and Guidance.pdf   1.92MB   32 downloads

 

I wouldn't make this list all inclusive, but these are the most common sources of food-borne illness.


Food Safety News  Marine Stewardship Council  Blue Ocean Institute  

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


Thanked by 2 Members:

#3 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4866 thanks
952
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 11 March 2019 - 10:21 AM

Hi Slab,

 

FDA PC compilation after signif. guessing appears to yield something like-

 

Attached File  mic.hazs-raw grain,spices,vegs.xlsx   8.46KB   25 downloads

 

I would expect levels for B.cereus and C.perfringens(?) but never seen any (USA) published (and not my product area).

 

@ Kasi4

Assumed to be cooked.

zero tolerant items are IMEX more often designated "not detected/25gram"

Packaging / Storage may also be relevant.

PS - the above is from a HACCP POV, if you are concerned with import regulations, the answer may be different.


Edited by Charles.C, 11 March 2019 - 11:42 AM.
expanded

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users