Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Accredited lab report vs Company Letterhead


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Bartholamew

Bartholamew

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 8 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 12 September 2019 - 02:40 PM

I was having a discussion with an aquaintance recently regarding external lab testing and how reported values are communicated to the customer. He requires that his admin team transpose external results onto company letterhead even in instances where the external report represents the entirety of the data to be shared.

 

Is there a risk in providing external results directly? Conversely, is there a benefit to transposing the results onto company letterhead?



#2 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,429 posts
  • 870 thanks
738
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA
    Never give up, never give in
    HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA USA

Posted 12 September 2019 - 02:46 PM

I don't have idea why someone would require lab results from on outside source be put on co letterhead unless the person was trying to make it appear that the lab is in house.

And none of our clients practice this.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging & Food Storage Industries
SQF Development, Implementation, eContinuity & Certification Consultants 
 
In a nutshell we help small to large businesses to get their act together (as needed), help them to co-develop
entire SQF documentation systems, make recommendations as to installations and repairs in order
to get certified and continue with on-going support thru our popular eConsultant program and we do
all within 30 days so your staff can implement with our assistance to retain and get new business!
 
Serving the new Republic of the United States of America & Alliance Countries

http://www.GlennOster.com


Thanked by 1 Member:

#3 zanorias

zanorias

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 778 posts
  • 230 thanks
149
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Motorcycling, Food Safety, Science, Water Sports, Nature

Posted 12 September 2019 - 04:43 PM

I can't think of any risk, if everything is above board. I would be very sceptical of a supplier that would not be willing to share a direct lab report.



#4 pHruit

pHruit

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,576 posts
  • 652 thanks
357
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:29 PM

I can't think of any risk, if everything is above board. I would be very sceptical of a supplier that would not be willing to share a direct lab report.

I completely agree with this - taking the results off the laboratories report diminishes their credibility, IMO.
If the results are legitimate and from an accredited laboratory then I want to see them on the report with the laboratory details and confirmation of their accreditation (usually they should confirm if any tests are outside the scope of the accreditation etc).



#5 wtheriot

wtheriot

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 42 posts
  • 23 thanks
33
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 12 September 2019 - 06:33 PM

If I were the receiving company I would request the results from the lab and NOT accept results on company letterhead. I too would be very skeptical why I wasn't getting lab results directly from the accredited lab.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users