Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

No stones rings, but not a wedding ring...what's your rule?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 The Food Scientist

The Food Scientist

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 956 posts
  • 245 thanks
182
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 03 December 2019 - 07:22 PM

Alright folks, this is a very common topic we have had but it still seem vague sometimes, so here is the scenario:

 

As everyone working in Food Manufacturing, we all have the same rule, NO rings with STONES. Some companies say only a wedding band with no stones, some say no rings AT all regardless if it has no stones or it does. Our rule is no stones on the ring, unless its a plain wedding ring. 

 

So an employee today showed up with a ring with no stones, BUT it was not a wedding ring. She said well it has no stones,,, and the rule says no stones and a wedding band that is plain is allowed, so how can you tell if its a wedding band or no? 

 

So how do you guys deal with such issues? Her ring had no stones, very similar to a plain wedding band but it was not a wedding band which we allow... They are not going to understand that though.. 

 

Any thoughts?

 

Edit: They all wear gloves. 


Edited by The Food Scientist, 03 December 2019 - 07:29 PM.

Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


#2 Setanta

Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,151 posts
  • 292 thanks
186
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted 03 December 2019 - 07:30 PM

We do not allow rings of any kind   People will always look for a loop-hole.


-Setanta         

 

 

 


Thanked by 1 Member:

#3 The Food Scientist

The Food Scientist

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 956 posts
  • 245 thanks
182
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 03 December 2019 - 07:35 PM

We do not allow rings of any kind   People will always look for a loop-hole.

 

GMPs are such a pain..  :angry:


Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


#4 QAGB

QAGB

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 671 posts
  • 252 thanks
104
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 03 December 2019 - 07:41 PM

I mean......I'm not going to go around asking people if they are married. If my policy says a plain band is ok, then I'm ok with that regardless of whether this person is married or not. 

 

If you want to get rid of the loop-hole, then no rings are allowed.


Edited by QAGB, 03 December 2019 - 07:42 PM.


Thanked by 1 Member:

#5 The Food Scientist

The Food Scientist

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 956 posts
  • 245 thanks
182
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 03 December 2019 - 08:17 PM

I mean......I'm not going to go around asking people if they are married. If my policy says a plain band is ok, then I'm ok with that regardless of whether this person is married or not. 

 

If you want to get rid of the loop-hole, then no rings are allowed.

 

 

LOL I agree. I am definitely not going to go around asking everyone if they are married or not.  :happydance:    That's what the employees argument was "how do you know who is married or not". 


Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


Thanked by 1 Member:

#6 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,241 posts
  • 833 thanks
693
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 03 December 2019 - 08:25 PM

We do not allow rings, regardless of type, stones, etc.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging & Food Storage Industry
SQF Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
Serving the new & beautiful Republic of the United States of America

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  

 

Why are Food Manufacturers changing ingredients?

https://glennosterco...m/ogfc/goc-blog


Thanked by 1 Member:

#7 mgourley

mgourley

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,236 posts
  • 918 thanks
191
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Plant City, FL
  • Interests:Cooking, golf, firearms, food safety and sanitation.

Posted 03 December 2019 - 09:36 PM

We allow plain wedding bands. We don't bother with determining who is/is not married.

If people are wearing gloves, not sure how it's an issue.

 

Seems like a reasonable compromise to me.

 

Marshall



Thanked by 3 Members:

#8 spencerw@innovasian

spencerw@innovasian

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 2 thanks
4
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 03 December 2019 - 11:55 PM

The GMP standard is religiously based. 

The reality is so long as it is a plain band with no stones or opportunity of microbiological buildup a plain band is a plain band.

The identified food safety risk was the stone not being removed by the CCP of removal of metal.

 

The other reality is per employee safety.

A great number of amputations annually were caused by compression or dragging of a ring in production.  I've witnessed 2: one in a conveyor and one stick going over a catwalk.

 

Many plants are going to no visible personal decoration; earrings, piercings, rings, nails, eye lashes, hair extensions.

 

As always the decision should be based on your companies risk acceptance level. 



Thanked by 2 Members:

#9 Sawad

Sawad

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 54 posts
  • 5 thanks
5
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kerala
  • Interests:Cooking, Gardening, Reading, Watching movies

Posted 04 December 2019 - 06:33 AM

AS per our policy " plain wedding rings are allowed".

When spotted someone with ring....will ask "is this wedding ring or not" ..if they say "yes"...no problem...if they say "NO" its not a wedding ring..then "please remove it" .

End of the story...



Thanked by 1 Member:

#10 Kit2019

Kit2019

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 5 thanks
4
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 04 December 2019 - 02:07 PM

Seems as though segregating your employees by "married" (allowed to wear ring) and "unmarried" (not allowed to wear plain band) is an invitation for hostility in the workplace at the very least.

 

In a professional work environment, there should be no reason for anyone outside of HR to inquire the marital status of your employees. 



Thanked by 3 Members:

#11 The Food Scientist

The Food Scientist

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 956 posts
  • 245 thanks
182
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 04 December 2019 - 02:30 PM

Seems as though segregating your employees by "married" (allowed to wear ring) and "unmarried" (not allowed to wear plain band) is an invitation for hostility in the workplace at the very least.

 

In a professional work environment, there should be no reason for anyone outside of HR to inquire the marital status of your employees. 

 

Thank you. That is part of why I posted this topic. I would feel uncomfortable running around and asking if they are married or no if they are wearing a plain band !  :headhurts:


Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


#12 Sawad

Sawad

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 54 posts
  • 5 thanks
5
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kerala
  • Interests:Cooking, Gardening, Reading, Watching movies

Posted 05 December 2019 - 05:31 AM

But if the policy or standard is like " No rings allowed, except Plaint wedding rings" then should we allow or not.....

 

from my point of view if the standard says only plain weddding rings allowed, then if a staff wearing ring should we ask or not...

 

NB: To be honest... (layman point of view what is the difference between plain weeding ring & wedding ring. 



Thanked by 1 Member:

#13 zanorias

zanorias

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 762 posts
  • 223 thanks
143
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Motorcycling, Food Safety, Science, Water Sports, Nature

Posted 05 December 2019 - 06:49 AM

We allow plain wedding bands only as per BRC. I don't ask whether someone is married to avoid opening a potential discriminatory/HR case.



Thanked by 2 Members:

#14 Dr.Khan

Dr.Khan

    DR

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 314 posts
  • 128 thanks
27
Excellent

  • Australia
    Australia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney
  • Interests:Food, Reading technical information,provding technical help in QA,R&D,staff Training, products and processes optimisation, watching documentaries and making presentations
    AM available as consultant in Quality Assurance, Product & process development/ optimisation, staff training and trouble shooting in complex manufacturing Environment

    Cal me on +61411588329 to discuss your requirements.

    Am available for International Assignments

Posted 05 December 2019 - 06:58 AM

The policy has to be clear for every one so either say plain ring are allowed or no ring of nay kind allowed. as an auditor am looking what is your policy is and have you implemented it correctly



Thanked by 2 Members:

#15 Sawad

Sawad

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 54 posts
  • 5 thanks
5
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kerala
  • Interests:Cooking, Gardening, Reading, Watching movies

Posted 05 December 2019 - 07:39 AM

But if the policy or standard is like " No rings allowed, except Plaint wedding rings" then should we allow or not.....

 

from my point of view if the standard says only plain weddding rings allowed, then if a staff wearing ring should we ask or not...

 

NB: To be honest... (layman point of view what is the difference between plain weeding ring & wedding ring. 

sorry slight correction ..normal plain ring & wedding ring...



#16 kfromNE

kfromNE

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 399 posts
  • 148 thanks
101
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bicycling, reading, nutrition, trivia

Posted 05 December 2019 - 01:21 PM

sorry slight correction ..normal plain ring & wedding ring...

 

There is a difference. Many wedding rings have stones in them which can become a physical hazard and they're more difficult to clean and can harbor pathogens. I agree, don't ask if they're married or not. In the US, employers can get in trouble if they ask this in an interview.



Thanked by 2 Members:

#17 dfreund

dfreund

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 58 posts
  • 14 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 December 2019 - 01:43 PM

You don't have an escalation of a food safety protocol in this concern. 

 

If you do allow a plain band the fight is not one that benefits the food safety culture.  This delineation that it has to be a "wedding band" or no band will be painted as trivial and controlling rather than upholding a standard for a good reason.

 

My larger concern for you is a personnel concern.  Do you have someone who is just pushing the envelope?  If so, giving in once may soon become 2 plain bands or more and we are back to rewriting GMPs in reaction to someone with a rebellious spirit.  That is a battle no one has the time to win.  The next "issue" at "hand" (LOL) will be something else equally hair splitting. 

 

A charismatic rebel will disrupt an otherwise good food safety culture. If you can win their food safety thought process and make them an advocate for food safety protocol, then fight the battle for the mind not for the letter of the law.  In winning this battle, they will become helpful to you.  If not, consider a non production job for them.

Dave



Thanked by 3 Members:

#18 Hoosiersmoker

Hoosiersmoker

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 458 posts
  • 167 thanks
66
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 05 December 2019 - 01:44 PM

In order to avoid opening your company up to legal recourse, either allow plain bands or no rings period. Your risk assessment should determine if rings are or are not allowed, it should have nothing to do with religion or commitment - is it safe for your process to allow them? Yes or No? Some states / countries do not allow same sex "marriages" so the representative ring may not technically be a wedding ring (even though a wedding is just the ceremony, the marriage is a commitment). We have removed the word "wedding" and just state "a plain band with no stones" which, according to the risk assessment performed, does not cause a food safety risk.



Thanked by 3 Members:

#19 The Food Scientist

The Food Scientist

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 956 posts
  • 245 thanks
182
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 05 December 2019 - 02:01 PM

In order to avoid opening your company up to legal recourse, either allow plain bands or no rings period. Your risk assessment should determine if rings are or are not allowed, it should have nothing to do with religion or commitment - is it safe for your process to allow them? Yes or No? Some states / countries do not allow same sex "marriages" so the representative ring may not technically be a wedding ring (even though a wedding is just the ceremony, the marriage is a commitment). We have removed the word "wedding" and just state "a plain band with no stones" which, according to the risk assessment performed, does not cause a food safety risk.

 

I guess that is what I am going to have to do. Just a "plain band". I really do not want to go on the discrimination side and create some hostile environment with the employees. Because if a plain "wedding" band poses no food safety risk, then a "plain non wedding band" is going to be the same. I always look at risk rather than just throwing out rules like that. We are a dry, spices RTE manufacturer and they must wear gloves all the time. 


Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


Thanked by 2 Members:

#20 Jocelyn Legaspi

Jocelyn Legaspi

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Philippines
    Philippines

Posted 06 December 2019 - 02:34 AM

in our plant, we do not allow ring (with or without stone) and this is stated in our policy. Though the standard allows plain wedding band. But; for food safety reason,we do not allow it to be worn as it could be a source of microbial as well as physical contaminant.  :happydance:



#21 JPO

JPO

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 130 posts
  • 66 thanks
15
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. Paul, MN

Posted 30 January 2020 - 05:45 PM

I'm not a fan of rings for safety reasons.  We eliminated "plain wedding bands" in our facility (well, the last facility I worked in) because we very nearly had a ring avulsion injury during assembly of equipment.  Don't google that phrase if you have a weak stomach. We did not decide to go with allowing "breakaway" rings or silicone or similar "safety" rings. It's simplest to just go with "no rings".



#22 The Food Scientist

The Food Scientist

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 956 posts
  • 245 thanks
182
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 30 January 2020 - 06:16 PM

I'm not a fan of rings for safety reasons.  We eliminated "plain wedding bands" in our facility (well, the last facility I worked in) because we very nearly had a ring avulsion injury during assembly of equipment.  Don't google that phrase if you have a weak stomach. We did not decide to go with allowing "breakaway" rings or silicone or similar "safety" rings. It's simplest to just go with "no rings".

 

oops! Was about to google....

 

I agree but it all depends on the type of job being performed. Like you said people working with assembly of equipment or machinery should not be wearing rings for safety reasons. In my facility the people wearing their rings just hand pack product (weight it and placing in bags). 


Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


#23 Setanta

Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,151 posts
  • 292 thanks
186
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted 30 January 2020 - 07:17 PM

Simple racking can cause the avulsion injury. I worked with someone at Target who got their wedding ring caught on shelving while they were reaching on to pick something off an upper  shelf in the back room. The weight of their own body did the damage. Any kind of equipment can cause injury to hands with rings                      Spoiler warning      (they lost the finger)


-Setanta         

 

 

 


#24 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,241 posts
  • 833 thanks
693
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 30 January 2020 - 07:23 PM

So, I was thinking about this and decided to give this link to owners of companies that don't want to include a No go for plain wedding bands - it works well -- warning - gory.

 

https://www.orthobul...ulsion-injuries


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging & Food Storage Industry
SQF Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
Serving the new & beautiful Republic of the United States of America

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  

 

Why are Food Manufacturers changing ingredients?

https://glennosterco...m/ogfc/goc-blog


#25 Jaskaran Singh Saini

Jaskaran Singh Saini

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 18 posts
  • 3 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 31 January 2020 - 06:06 AM

Hello team
In our plant same type of issue we are facing.
We are allow specific people for use ring like name register in person hygine format.
One day in my company one ring found on floor. We ask all the person but no reply due to its a policy's of wedding ring but not track so we select the person to show then regular basis after non wedding person ring reduces to show on daily feeling useless activities but wedding person always show


So now only 13 person in production kept wedding ring with tracking data


Regards
Jaskaran






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users