2 replies to this topic

[knvtran135]

Hello, please help. When the auditor say " Following HACCP, you must evaluate if you have a critical control point. If you follow codex, they have a decision tree available to help make that determination. Your plan as written only considered applying a preventive control, which abides by FSMA/FDA requirements but does not meet HACCP by Codex standards. " What is this mean??? Thank you.

 

[Scampi]

What process did you use to determine that you did or did not have CCPs?

 

https://blog.safetyc...ood-safety-plan   This article explains the differences

 

A HACCP plan is (generally speaking) more robust that a PC plan

 

 

I've attached the decision tree I use  decision tree.PNG   322.17KB   1 downloads

[Charles.C]

 

Hello,

 

Please help. When the auditor say " Following HACCP, you must evaluate if you have a critical control point. If you follow codex, they have a decision tree available to help make that determination. 

 

Your plan as written only considered applying a preventive control, which abides by FSMA/FDA requirements but does not meet HACCP by Codex standards. "

 

What is this mean??? Thank you

 

 

Hi knvtran,

 

It probably means that Codex-based CCPs are not always the same as FSMA/Preventive Controls.

 

Was there a GFSI-recognised Standard involved ?

 

Please provide basic information regarding yr product/process and the specific process points/CCPs which generated  yr auditor's remark ?.

 

(Note that yr auditor seems unaware that Codex's latest haccp document has recently "dropped" it's long-utilised (vertical) decision tree).