Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Reuse of boxes for shipping

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

detario

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 41 posts
  • 6 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Upstate New York

Posted 14 October 2021 - 02:35 PM

Hello, my company is very environmentally friendly, and they want to reuse cardboard boxes that we receive our packaging in to ship out finished product.  They want to know if this is allowable under NSF and GMP guidelines, and I haven't found anything stating that we can't do it but it seems a little iffy to me.  I told them we shouldn't use any that already have printed labels on them but that I would check about plain boxes.  If anyone could shed some light I would appreciate it.



olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 14 October 2021 - 04:36 PM

I've never heard of that: how are you going to trace your packaging? How can you be sure that re-used packaging is not affecting food safety - especially in case of complaints? Also, you're supposed to have all information on file for the materials you're using in your production, including packaging. (e.g. material specifications, drawings, permits, etc.) There could be more questions arising from this situation - are you or your management sure caring for the environment is more important than food safety and compliance to regulatory requirements?



Thanked by 1 Member:

MDaleDDF

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 527 posts
  • 209 thanks
405
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 October 2021 - 04:50 PM

If you want to be green, recycle.   Even outside of guidelines, it would just look cheap to me.   Definitely a no go here....



Thanked by 1 Member:

TimG

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 642 posts
  • 191 thanks
320
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 October 2021 - 05:04 PM

Good morning Detario.

You are going to want to check the NSF standard you operated under, there are tons ranging from water chemicals to plastic fittings. As far as FDA regulated GMP's:

21 CFR § 110.37 Sanitary facilities and controls.

Plant construction and design. Plant buildings and structures shall be suitable in size, construction, and design to facilitate maintenance and sanitary operations for food-manufacturing purposes. The plant and facilities shall:

(1) Provide sufficient space for such placement of equipment and storage of materials as is necessary for the maintenance of sanitary operations and the production of safe food.

(2) Permit the taking of proper precautions to reduce the potential for contamination of food, food-contact surfaces, or food-packaging materials with microorganisms, chemicals, filth, or other extraneous material.

 

I laud your company taking proactive steps toward 're-use,' as 'reduce>reuse>recycle,' but you would have to make sure you meet the above requirements for contamination.



Thanked by 1 Member:

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,489 posts
  • 1511 thanks
1,551
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 14 October 2021 - 06:36 PM

hard no for all the reasons above plus an eeeeew factor


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,662 posts
  • 1139 thanks
1,132
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 14 October 2021 - 07:45 PM

Tgis does not fly, in the lonf term and have seen it artempted a nunber of tines. Better to dind anoyher way ti shave pennies.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


detario

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 41 posts
  • 6 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Upstate New York

Posted 14 October 2021 - 09:51 PM

Thank you all for the responses!  It did not sit well with me either (I'm a strong proponent of environmentalism as well), and I appreciate the clarity.  Currently trying to convince them to use a compactor and recycle it, we may be able to get a small amount of money this way also.



Ryan M.

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,329 posts
  • 479 thanks
290
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham, AL
  • Interests:Reading, crosswords, passionate discussions, laughing at US politics.

Posted 15 October 2021 - 09:00 PM

For clarity...this is secondary / tertiary packaging correct?  It seems all the responses are pointing to it being primary packaging, but seems like it isn't.

 

It's a unique situation, and you can run into product identification and labeling issues at your customers.  Do you ship to DC's? Retailers? Other?



detario

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 41 posts
  • 6 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Upstate New York

Posted 15 October 2021 - 10:08 PM

Yes, this is the boxes used by our shipping dept./warehouse.  Everything is finished product in packaging that has all been qc checked, then it is put in the shipping boxes afterwards.  The only time we would use this practice is when we were shipping to a company that contracted us to make certain products for them.  The boxes used to ship would either be plain or the ones originally used to send us the bottles that we eventually fill.



Ryan M.

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,329 posts
  • 479 thanks
290
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham, AL
  • Interests:Reading, crosswords, passionate discussions, laughing at US politics.

Posted 16 October 2021 - 10:41 PM

I really don't see the big issue then.  So long as you keep the boxes dry and protected.

 

How many of you have been to a cardboard manufacturing facility?  lol....eegad.....



Abby7

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 31 posts
  • 3 thanks
4
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 19 October 2021 - 04:43 PM

Hello:

 

We are SQF certified and pack frozen product into bulk cases which are lined with new LDPE bags during our fresh-frozen season.

When we are freezing out of spec fruit that we know will need to be re-inspected on site before it can be packed for retail, we will re-use bulk cases - maximum of 3 times (they are lot coded each time).

But we have procedures/training in place to ensure the cases never touch the floor or other unclean surface and they are properly palletized and wrapped before storage.

 

When I first came onboard here, I also struggled between the 'eeww' factor and the 'green' factor, but given it is secondary packaging, which is always fully lined with new liners, we have continued this practice and gained our SQF certification.

 

However, the scenario from deterio, does not have the internal controls on how this secondary packaging is handled from when the case was 'new'.

So IMO - reusing secondary packaging with an unknown 'history' isn't a good idea from a food safe or regulatory perspective.

Just have no idea what contamination could be transferred from the case onto the employees hands or other surface.

 

Just my 2 cents...



Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users