Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Hand-written incident reports vs electronic

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic
- - - - -

MedGirl

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 07 December 2021 - 10:37 PM

Just a quick question – we currently hand-write our incident reports.  We would like to move to just typing them into word documents instead.  Is that acceptable or is the best/standard practice to use hand-written or some type of app that provides a full audit trail?

 

We are audited to a Whole Foods GMP standard only, but may work toward SQF in coming years.

 



Sarah_E_W

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 29 posts
  • 3 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 07 December 2021 - 10:42 PM

It depends on the application of reporting, sometimes if electronic can turn into a tick the box exercise and a lazy copy and paste job which doesn't benefit anyone. However, there are a lot of benefits of electronic systems and some which are relatively inexpensive. 

 

There's a one I've used before and you can create templates which make it less tick the box, as evidence has to be provided before moving to anther section. They did used to offer a free month trial.  

 

I-Auditor if you search for it



kingstudruler1

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 825 posts
  • 284 thanks
242
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 07 December 2021 - 10:45 PM

either hand written or electronic should be acceptable for sqf.   

 

im not sure what you mean by incident.   I like having a non-conformity log that everyone has access to on sharepoint.   


eb2fee_785dceddab034fa1a30dd80c7e21f1d7~

    Twofishfs@gmail.com

 


FoodSafetyAPP

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 44 posts
  • 8 thanks
12
Good

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 08 December 2021 - 11:18 AM

I don't think it matters - agree with above as long as you aren't loosing the authenticity if you move to typing. I have non-conformances electronic on a log for both production and internal audits for ease of overview / trending / sharing but things like a recall are handwritten, not necessarily for any particular reason. 

 

Also agree I-Auditor is handy - I trialled it before and personally it didn't work for the site I was at but I believe it could be a really useful tool.


Edited by FoodSafetyAPP, 08 December 2021 - 11:19 AM.


jkoratich712

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 99 posts
  • 19 thanks
19
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food, books, bakeries, coffee, HACCP, sanitation

Posted 08 December 2021 - 03:07 PM

I have used a variety over the years, all under SQF Certification. Some were hand written, that I then scanned and saved as PDF. Some were completed using word documents and now currently using electronic forms. At some point we were using all three different styles as we were transitioning. An auditor has never questioned any of the methods that we used. 



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,630 posts
  • 1135 thanks
1,126
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 06 January 2022 - 03:07 PM

Either way is fine.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


Duncan

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 76 posts
  • 16 thanks
19
Good

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 07 January 2022 - 01:31 PM

I think hand-written reports and electronic records are basically equivalent for recording the occurrence of an incident, but after that point electronic systems are superior. 

 

If you use a digital system, corrective/preventative actions can be monitored more effectively and it's easier for management to have visibility over implementation of responsive actions.

Also, an electronic system can do a good an d efficient job of categorising and trending incidents - whereas a more manual process is likely to result in a lot of administration by comparison.

 

Just from a compliance point of view, you can use any approach you choose - provided you satisfy all of the obligations of the standard you're working to.


FOOD PORTAL - The web portal dedicated to the food industry

 

Food Portal provides a range of systems and tools for food manufacturers.

 

 Resource Library - Culture Survey - Confidential Reporting - Supplier Directory - Blog




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users