Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Product Release Policy

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

NorCalNate

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 69 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 24 May 2022 - 07:28 PM

I work for a winery who produces and bottles all our products and we are going for SQF Certification. My question is about our Product Release Policy, and more specifically how deep does our Product Release Policy have to go. Below are my main questions:

 

1) Does our release policy only need to address Food Safety hazards, or does it also need to address food Fraud? For example, we perform post-bottling analysis to make sure the alcohol matches TTB Label standards

 

2) Part of our release process requires my position to actually review Lab results and signoff on them. The Lab tech is SQF Certified, so can she approve of that portion herself, or is secondary verification required?

 

My previous company had a very straight forward release process. I would fill out a spreadsheet for each bottling and identify if there was any type of HOLD. Once the product passed Micro, I would release the product as long as there was not any type of HOLD. Wine is a VERY safe product.

 

Basically I'm trying to find the most efficient way to comply with this code. I'm already super busy and need to create as efficient a release system as possible.



NorCalNate

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 69 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 24 May 2022 - 07:37 PM

For more context, I oversee all Bottling Quality HOLDs and would be the one putting product on HOLD if necessary. If our product passes micro testing and the post-bottling analysis confirms product is acceptable (which is more of a quality and fraud check), do I have to verify or sign off on their analysis prior to releasing the product, or can they email me the product has passed and I take it from there? 



olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 24 May 2022 - 07:40 PM

1) Address both

2) SQF certified lab tech would do it - unless the GFSI scheme specifies double-verification, but I doubt it

Don't overcomplicate the process.



Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,486 posts
  • 1511 thanks
1,550
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 24 May 2022 - 07:41 PM

You can mange this piece however it works for you   SQF is not dictating what you do---just that you follow whatever you say you'll do

 

where I am we have a one liner in our program that our product does not require a release UNLESS it's on hold

 

So you're program would show the flow----lab report----lab tech review/sign----product released         OR lab report------lab tech review-FLAG----product placed on HOLD


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs




Share this


Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: product release, release requirements

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users