Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Allergen conversions

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

AJL

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 362 posts
  • 22 thanks
38
Excellent

  • Germany
    Germany
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 June 2022 - 08:41 PM

Hi!

Hoping from some math brains to pop up here and save me!

I have found some great allergen (gluten) swabs with detection limit of 4ug/25cm2. 

When I sent the swabs in to the lab to get a validation, the units come back in g/L. 

How do I convert so I end up with the same units? It would just be great to know how close to the LOD I got to with the positive result. The lower the better, then I can see that my swabs work close to the LOD. 

THANKS in advance 


  • 0

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5704 thanks
1,554
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 19 June 2022 - 07:35 AM

Hi!

Hoping from some math brains to pop up here and save me!

I have found some great allergen (gluten) swabs with detection limit of 4ug/25cm2. 

When I sent the swabs in to the lab to get a validation, the units come back in g/L. 

How do I convert so I end up with the same units? It would just be great to know how close to the LOD I got to with the positive result. The lower the better, then I can see that my swabs work close to the LOD. 

THANKS in advance 

Hi AJL,

 

I assume the "swab" delivered to lab was a "swab"  immersed in a liquid (S).

I assume swabbed area was 25cm2

I assume "ug" = microgram

 

volume of S = X  litre

lab result = Y g/litre

Relevant allergen (gluten) in swab = G

 

Then (With a few assumptions) -

Quantity of G associated with swabbing area of 25cm2  = XY grams = XY x  106 ug

 

Can compare to 4 ug

 

JFI this example might also intrigue you -

 

https://www.factssa....sked-questions/


  • 1

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 2 Members:

AJL

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 362 posts
  • 22 thanks
38
Excellent

  • Germany
    Germany
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 June 2022 - 09:36 AM

Thanks Charles,
The swab was not immersed in liquid, but the swab was slightly moistened. The lab must have immersed in a standard amount of extraction solution, which I do not know.
Yes ug=mcg.
Yes swabbed area is 25cm2.
I assume this means that I cannot complete the conversion unless I know the amount of liquid which the lab used for the submersion?
I am not impressed by the units they used, I would have preferred g/swab. I will read the link you shared. Thank you!!


  • 0

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,856 posts
  • 1451 thanks
792
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 20 June 2022 - 03:06 AM

Hi AJL,

 

I would ask the Laboratory for a copy of their test method, that should explain their reporting. Post it here if it doesn't make sense.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. 

Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.

Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.


AJL

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 362 posts
  • 22 thanks
38
Excellent

  • Germany
    Germany
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 June 2022 - 03:41 AM

Thanks Tony 👍 good point


  • 0

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5704 thanks
1,554
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 20 June 2022 - 07:32 AM

Thanks Charles,
The swab was not immersed in liquid, but the swab was slightly moistened. The lab must have immersed in a standard amount of extraction solution, which I do not know.
Yes ug=mcg.
Yes swabbed area is 25cm2.
I assume this means that I cannot complete the conversion unless I know the amount of liquid which the lab used for the submersion?
I am not impressed by the units they used, I would have preferred g/swab. I will read the link you shared. Thank you!!

Hi AJL,

 

Re ^^^(red) - Yes, you will presumably need some feedback from Lab. The quantitative process is not exactly "simple".

 

Are you using a particular commercial Product/testkit ?  If so, which one ? (This should detail how to proceed or offer technical backup on request).

 

The ELISA methodology typically requires extraction of the allergenic protein from the swab. The extract is then sampled/analysed.

 

JFI, I noticed this caveat for one commercial system -

 

How long can sample extracts and swabs be stored before testing?
Swabs can be stored for up to 24 hours at 4°C after sample collection provided they have not been extracted yet. Once extracted, samples from swabs should be evaluated within 4 hours. All other sample extracts should also be tested within 4 hours.

 

PS - you may also find this Production-oriented illustration of interest although (a) the included  VITAL-interpreted material likely has geographically restricted useability and (b) note the words "extreme" /  "homogeneously" :smile:  -

 

https://www.zeulab.c...l-de-alergenos/


  • 0

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


AJL

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 362 posts
  • 22 thanks
38
Excellent

  • Germany
    Germany
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 June 2022 - 07:51 AM

I am using Römer labs rapid test kit, the lab I assume is using Elisa, with result in g/L


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users