Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Six Problem-solving Fundamentals

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,953 posts
  • 1375 thanks
932
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 06 June 2004 - 05:09 PM

Six Problem-Solving Fundamentals:
Create an effective tool for continual improvement with these practical steps
By Craig Cochran


The essence of continual improvement is the ability to solve problems effectively. When an actual-or potential-problem crops up, its root cause is first identified, and action is taken to eliminate it. If an organization progressively seeks out and eliminates problems in this way, continual improvement results. It's that simple.

Read Full Article

Regards,
Simon

  • 0

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Wallace Tait

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 174 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral
  • Location:Ontario, Canada
  • Interests:Systems thinking, Soccer (Glasgow Rangers), Family, the pusuit of truth and freedom

Posted 11 June 2004 - 01:34 AM

I had the pleasure of speaking with Craig a few days ago. He is indeed a very gifted and forward thinking professional, a man ahead of his time for sure.
Wallace.


  • 0

Jim Wade

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 123 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:All aspects of continual improvement

Posted 11 June 2004 - 02:14 AM

A quick glance tells me there's some very good stuff in Craig's article.

However, one sentence jumped out at me...

Even if your organization uses a team approach to problem solving, every problem should be assigned to a specific individual.


I agree with the second part of the sentence, but I'm surprised by the first bit.

Surely any problem that is being approached systematically must involve a 'team approach'!

How else can we:

1 ensure that the problem is correctly stated?

2 understand the possible causes [root or otherwise] and the processes in which they might lie?

rgds Jim

  • 0



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users