Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

California AB660 Food Date Labeling Rule – B2B Exempt?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

MaxFoods

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 05 May 2025 - 02:22 PM

We sell ingredients to other businesses for use in their manufacturing process. Our products are not for retail sale. We do not use best by or use by dates on most of our products, unless requested by a customer. 

 

I'm trying to interpret the new CA rule for Food Date Labeling. If we currently don't put best by or use by dates on our product, and the new regulation states, "when labeling products", does this mean we are (1) now required to add "Best if used by" or "Use by" to product or (2) exempt from rule as we don't include dates on product in the first place?

 

Appreciate your interpretation of new rule. Thank you!

 

From the CDFA - Inspection Services - Food Date Labeling:

 

"AB 660 (Irwin) requires food manufacturers to use uniform terminology when labeling products with "quality" or "safety" dates and bans the use of consumer-facing "sell-by" dates. Starting July 1, 2026, this bill prohibits the sale of any food item (except eggs and infant formula) for human consumption in California that is not labeled for quality using the terms "best if used by" or "best if frozen by" or labeled for food safety using the terms "use by" or "use or freeze by."


  • 0

jfrey123

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,055 posts
  • 281 thanks
515
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 05 May 2025 - 05:30 PM

I think that entire law only applies to items offered to consumers, either through a retail store or through your own online sales.  Note lots of use of "consumer-facing" and "labeling food items intended for human consumption" within the actual bill.  Your B2B items aren't being sold as consumer facing or intended for human consumption but intended as an ingredient in further manufacturing.


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

kfromNE

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,231 posts
  • 325 thanks
383
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bicycling, reading, nutrition, trivia

Posted 05 May 2025 - 06:05 PM

I agree with jfrey123. You don't need to add a use-by-date on your products. To stay on the safe side - for customers that request use-by-dates - I would use the verbiage the used in the new CA bill.  


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

MaxFoods

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 06 May 2025 - 02:26 PM

I agree with jfrey123. You don't need to add a use-by-date on your products. To stay on the safe side - for customers that request use-by-dates - I would use the verbiage the used in the new CA bill.  

 

 

I think that entire law only applies to items offered to consumers, either through a retail store or through your own online sales.  Note lots of use of "consumer-facing" and "labeling food items intended for human consumption" within the actual bill.  Your B2B items aren't being sold as consumer facing or intended for human consumption but intended as an ingredient in further manufacturing.

Those were my thoughts as well. Thank you jfrey123 and kfromNE, appreciate the response and additional call out from the actual bill. We will certainly use the verbiage required if requested to keep in line.


  • 0



Share this


Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: California Regulation AB660, CDFA, Food Date Labeling, USE by, BEST if Used by, Quality Dates, Safety Dates, Sell-by Dates, B2B, New Regulation

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users