Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Delivery Driver Hygiene

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

Andy_Yellows

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 212 posts
  • 38 thanks
27
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Anglia, UK
  • Interests:Football, Dr Pepper

Posted Yesterday, 12:43 PM

Hi all, looking to get some advice from those working in distribution sites regarding vehicle drivers' handwashing and general hygiene. We've been asked to clarify in our hygiene policy how drivers are to eat, drink or smoke while on the road and maintain good hygiene (i.e. clean their hands) and now I'm a bit stumped.

 

Drivers aren't allows to smoke inside company vehicles and we send our drivers out with hand santiser but we all know this doesn't do the same job as proper handwashing under running water and certainly wouldn't be enough to remove allergens. What sort of policies do you guys have in place for this?

 

Thanks,

Andy


Edited by Andy_Yellows, Yesterday, 12:52 PM.

  • 0

TimG

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 785 posts
  • 218 thanks
384
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted Yesterday, 01:02 PM

"We've been asked to clarify in our hygiene policy" to try to determine intent behind this request, who asked and why?


  • 1

Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,861 posts
  • 398 thanks
516
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted Yesterday, 01:26 PM

Are the drivers handling uncovered product? Do they enter other facilities' production area? 

I don't see the importance of this.


  • 2

-Setanta         

 

 

 


marco89634

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 2 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Italy
    Italy

Posted Yesterday, 02:11 PM

Hi Andy, hand washing is fundamental: it is required by Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 and explicitly demanded by GFSI standards such as BRCGS Issue 9 paragraph 4.5 and IFS Logistics v2.3  paragraph 4. Technical guidelines (best practice) recommend following the five classic steps—rubbing with soap for at least 20 seconds, using warm water around 30–40 °C and drying with disposable material—to achieve maximum effectiveness. These steps are essential for removing allergens, something that disinfectant gel does not do well; therefore gel may be used only after washing or in emergencies when hands are visibly clean.

 

The operator must wash their hands mandatorily before starting loading/unloading operations, after breaks or meals or smoking, after using the restroom, after touching dirty or potentially contaminated surfaces, after completing loading/unloading operations, and after removing potentially contaminated PPE. Specific precautions, including single-use gloves (to be changed at least every hour, after each loading/unloading operation, if damaged, or when changing significant tasks), must be selected according to a documented risk matrix based on objective criteria such as product type, packaging, destination and other relevant factors.

To ensure access to water, the operator should have either portable sinks on board (minimum capacity 20 L, equipped to keep water warm even in winter—at least 25 °C—with documented maintenance and water replacement every 24 hours or at shift end) or an up-to-date map of rest areas with facilities. Rules on food, drink and smoking are strict: these activities are allowed only during designated breaks, never during operations; smoking must occur at a safe distance (minimum 10 m) and hands must always be washed afterward.

For high-risk loads, certain foods must be banned from the cabin and a thorough cleaning must be carried out according to the sanitization plan, which defines minimum frequency (e.g. Class A: daily; Class B: at least twice a week; Class C: weekly), appropriate products (e.g. alkaline detergent followed by at least 70 % alcohol-based disinfectant or compliant with EN 1276/13697) and provides for periodic checks (e.g. ATP test or allergen swab every three months on critical points), documenting everything in a dedicated log.

A standard hygiene kit must be implemented and training (at least one hour per year covering basic hygiene, allergens, PPE use, with learning verification) must be effective and recorded (specifying how, who archives, and stored for at least three years). Inspections (checklists, quarterly internal audits) must be carried out systematically and measured with KPIs with clear targets (e.g. minimum 95 % audit compliance), analyzing data periodically. There must be a clear non-conformity procedure (e.g. 1st critical NC = training reminder; 2nd NC within six months = temporary suspension with mandatory specific course and evaluation before returning to service). Clearly define who does what. Every driver must be trained and comply with these rules. A clear policy is essential to ensure product safety and maintain customer trust.


  • 0

MDaleDDF

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 714 posts
  • 241 thanks
525
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 02:21 PM

Are the drivers handling uncovered product? Do they enter other facilities' production area? 

I don't see the importance of this.

Yeah, neither do I.   The above post says they need to have portable sinks on their rig?  Seriously?   

We unload our own trucks, the driver touches nothing anyway, but even if he did, is this suggesting truck drivers have a responsibility to monitor their handwashing at all times outside our facility?   Because if I were a truck driver, I'd laugh at this.....


  • 1

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,403 posts
  • 820 thanks
343
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Yesterday, 03:42 PM

The key thing for me is providing toilet facilities with handwashing at sites.  Beyond that, how is it more relevant than an employee driving to work?


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


TimG

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 785 posts
  • 218 thanks
384
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted Yesterday, 04:51 PM

Yeah, that's why I was trying to figure out who asked him to do this. FS scheme auditor? Let's dig into the code they reference. Customers auditor? What was the exact requirement/wording and was it on an audit report or just something they mentioned in passing.

I can't imagine this being anything more than your typical customer auditor trying to 'find something' to write up to show they performed a 'thorough' audit.


  • 0

marco89634

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 2 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Italy
    Italy

Posted Yesterday, 06:18 PM

Hello everyone,
Thank you for your comments and for sharing your operational experiences. 
The initial request to "clarify the hygiene policy" opened up a spectrum of interpretations, ranging from the most basic to the most exhaustive. My response aimed precisely to provide a range of considerations, from the regulatory foundations to the best practices required by the most demanding standards, because an effective "hygiene policy" needs to be robust enough to cover various eventualities.
I understand that some measures might seem excessive if applied indiscriminately to every context. My intention, in responding to the general request to provide elements for building a policy that is as comprehensive and adaptable as possible, was to offer a framework from which each company can then extract and calibrate specific measures based on its own detailed risk assessment. Sometimes, starting with a broad perspective helps ensure that aspects which might prove critical in certain circumstances are not overlooked.
These are points for reflection, intended to enrich the discussion on how best to ensure hygiene in food transport. My initial analysis, perhaps perceived as overly prescriptive, aimed to provide a comprehensive "arsenal" of considerations. The real challenge, and here I agree with the spirit of many observations, lies in the ability of each organization to select and calibrate the most appropriate measures, based on an honest, thorough, and continuously updated risk assessment.
Thank you all.

  • 0

Lynx42

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 99 posts
  • 22 thanks
17
Good

  • United States
    United States

Posted Yesterday, 10:05 PM

This seems a bit extra to me (I have a couple customers who asks stuff like this occasionally) and I tend to push back on some of it. It's okay for some stuff to be common sense.  I'd definitely ask whoever asked this what regulation or standard they are referring to.

 

At our facilities, everyone (drivers, visitors, employees) is required to wash their hands when entering our warehouse, so what they do in their truck doesn't really matter.

 

I had a customer wanted to see our policy stating that employees are supposed to report broken windows.  I showed them where they are trained to report glass and brittle plastic breakage, showed we had the windows listed on our GBP map and that they are shatter proof, and showed them the inspection schedule, but they wanted to see where it said "Employees are required to report broken windows immediately." 

Another wanted to know, in writing, what we'd do if someone came in with a fake ID.  No context behind it, just "What would you do if someone comes in with a fake id."  I pushed back with we are not qualified to determine if an ID is fake and visitors are usually scheduled and no visitor, even unscheduled regulatory visitors, are allowed in the warehouse without an escort.


  • 0

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,640 posts
  • 1385 thanks
749
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted Today, 06:11 AM

Hi Andy,

 

First of all, smoking is typically banned in all company vehicles and this should also apply to any contracted vehicles.

 

With the main food safety certification standards, the requirements for vehicle operations tend to mainly apply to the load-carrying area although without specifics they expect personal hygiene requirements to be applied to vehicle drivers and any assistants and rules on eating and drinking need to be established.

 

The level of driver hygiene ‘on the road’ should be such that the vehicle cab is maintained in a clean and tidy condition and IMO the hygiene requirements would be dependent on the product and the level of protection of the products so for example taking into consider if the driver is delivering a RTE open product or an enclosed product (for open RTE product laundry of uniforms might be something that needs to be considered). Sometimes delivery drivers aren’t handling the product at all, just opening the doors and checking the order is correct so the rules need to be appropriate to the operation.

 

If it isn’t practical to schedule in rest stops then I would think it is reasonable to permit eating and drinking with a daily cab hygiene check and some wipes/hand sanitiser for hand cleaning.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 


  • 0

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Available via the previous webinar recording. 


Andy_Yellows

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 212 posts
  • 38 thanks
27
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Anglia, UK
  • Interests:Football, Dr Pepper

Posted Today, 09:49 AM

Thank you all for your input- for clarity, we aren't GFSI certified and are SALSA accredited (for those outside the UK, SALSA is a pretty scaled down FS accreditation for small-medium sized companies) and our auditor has asked us to clarify in our policy ahead of our next audit how drivers are to clean their hands after eating, drinking or smoking whilst on their delivery routes.

 

From most of the feedback, however, it sounds as though I need to push back a bit and state that while we equip them as best we can with hand sanitiser, it isn't practicable to demand much more of them.

 

For further context, the drivers handle reusable plastic crates (washed on return to site) which contain either packed products or loose fruit and veg, so no high-risk RTE products are handled directly by the drivers.

 

Open to further comments or opinions but hopefully this is something I can argue with a bit of common sense.

 

Regards, Andy


  • 0



Share this

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users