Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

metal detectors

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

kconf

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 360 posts
  • 35 thanks
71
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted Yesterday, 04:32 PM

Hi all,

Could someone share info on FDA/BRC guidelines for metal detector calibration/certification please? Is it annual or biannual?


  • 0

kconf

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 360 posts
  • 35 thanks
71
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted Yesterday, 07:58 PM

Come on experts, I need answers  :lol2:


  • 0

Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,887 posts
  • 404 thanks
533
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted Yesterday, 09:03 PM

Come on experts, I need answers  :lol2:

 

 

BRC is not my thing, man!   :spoton:


  • 0

-Setanta         

 

 

 


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,710 posts
  • 1397 thanks
766
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted Today, 03:57 AM

Come on experts, I need answers  :lol2:

 

Sorry kconf I was asleep when you posted!  :closedeyes:   :notworking:

 

BRCGS does not require annual calibration/certification for metal detectors, I would refer to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

 

See BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 Clause 4.10.3.3 Documented metal detector and X-ray procedures - Guidance:

 

‘The set-up and design of the operating procedures will need to consider a number of factors, which will affect the sensitivity of the detector and the effectiveness of the rejection mechanisms, including, for example:

• size and type of product – product size and composition can affect the sensitivity of the detector and therefore its ability to identify

• product packaging – product is normally tested in pack, but certain types of packaging will prevent this

• line operating speeds – there must be sufficient time for the detector to identify the presence of a contaminant and the rejection mechanism to accurately and consistently remove the implicated pack from the product flow

• location of the detector – should be risk-assessed to ensure that the placement efficiently and effectively minimises the risk of foreign bodies in the finished product

• customer-specific requirements – some customers have specific requirements relating to detector sensitivity or frequency of tests

• identification of the least sensitive (sometimes referred to as the weakest) part of the detector, to ensure that any contaminated product will still be rejected, even if the contaminant is located at this weakest point.’ 

 

'The frequency of testing must be based on the quantity and type(s) of product. However, the following should be considered: ..... blah, blah etc.'

 

The Standard does not require routine calibration of metal detectors beyond the verification/checking activities described in this section. However, planned maintenance or servicing may have value depending on the machine, the manufacturer’s specification, the contract and/or the operating environment.’

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 


GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,593 posts
  • 843 thanks
404
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Today, 07:42 AM

Don't forget that original set up would require a level of validation on efficacy and retailer standards often go above and beyond BRCGS.  I also agree with the above that PPM may essentially be the same as that normally considered a revalidation (a term I hate personally) or calibration and the lack of planned maintenance might be an issue without it.

 

Also remember any changes may require some level of revalidation.  So for example, significant formulation changes or relocation of the detector but that shouldn't wait for an annual service if you decide to do that.

 

Where are you based?


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.




Share this


2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users