Dear Brendan,
This is an opinion if entering the BRC arena from a substantially “practical” QA route with limited experience of ISO type products.
Clearly, the previous posters are correct in their laying out some basic professional necessities of getting into the consultant business. Speaking as, up till now, only a user, their recommendations also have pertinence from a knowledge aspect IMO. Not that I would wish to give too much boost to the auditing trade (many thanks guys / gals for the cool and not-so-cool arguments over the years!) but I have to reluctantly admit having learned much from their services in the good cases.
IMEX, internal company quality systems are much more user – friendly in that they are already dedicated (and often more direct) procedures which have been refined by historically good and especially bad previous experiences of predecessors. Especially true for “successful” high-end quality companies IMEX (although well-documented incidents demonstrate that even the mighty can still make massive screw-ups both conceptually and technically).
As you probably already know, basic BRC – type systems initially borrowed large chunks of the, particularly 9000, ISO management treatises and added similar extracts from HACCP and GMP (with some added specialised knowledge for more esoteric areas like packaging). Typical HACCP/GMP rounded QA personnel should find the non- ISO content demanding but not massively so IMO. Unfortunately, also IMO, ISO presentations and derivatives tend to be unrivalled in their incomprehensibility from a purely English language viewpoint. If you ever look at web forums on such topics, half the time contributed is simply translating the codicils into normal English for the bewildered. A lot of the rest is explaining what the technical expectations of the various clauses are particularly from an auditing viewpoint, eg the “should” and “shall” tricks, document control, blah blah blah (this is one unchallenged [and surely profitable ] auditing niche IMO). Of course these “tricks” vary within BRC, IFS etc and the best and quickest way if you hv funds is to do the offered courses and see the gimmicks. With yr background this will probably not require enormous technical demands (unless maybe to include specialities like BRC-IOP). If money is a critical factor, more indirect approaches involving more manouevring / personal time are usually necessary.
No direct experience but I’m sure the previous comments correct regarding significant competition in Europe. Particularly since all these standards are now presumably bread and butter items for the audit companies unlike, maybe, 10 + years ago, when expertise was limited. Simon’s comments regarding costs into Asia are also spot-on in IMEX.
Maybe you should also seriously consider ISO 22000, plenty of scope for insertion / improvement there !! (just look at this forum’s meanderings over interpretations, = enter the auditor).
Good luck and very interested to hear how you progress,
Rgds / Charles.C