Any information would be appreciated.
Thanks
Posted 28 August 2010 - 08:16 PM
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:15 PM
BUMP for BT85.
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
Posted 31 August 2010 - 02:01 AM
Dear BT85,
Bit confused, most people seem to produce tea from the leaf ??
eg http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__28744
Yr flow chart(s) might help.
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 31 August 2010 - 08:55 AM
One is microstatic while the other is microcidal and in this case I would say the microcidal is the CCP while the benzoate is purely added for the purpose of extending/ensuring the product shelf life. However, if lethal treatment is not a process then the microstatic control becomes a CCP.Would it be the addition of sodium benzoate, pasteurization, or both?
Posted 31 August 2010 - 02:54 PM
One is microstatic while the other is microcidal and in this case I would say the microcidal is the CCP while the benzoate is purely added for the purpose of extending/ensuring the product shelf life. However, if lethal treatment is not a process then the microstatic control becomes a CCP.
Cheers
Charles Chew
Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Live Webinar next Friday May 09, 2025
Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording.
Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here
Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages:
Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here
Posted 31 August 2010 - 04:50 PM
Dear All,
Just to re-state the obvious -
The previous posts assume that there is a significant safety risk and a corresponding, validatable, corrective action as per the definition of CCP (if that is what is indeed postulated). Any pasteurisation step is usually a strong candidate for a CCP in most processes since that is why it is there. Assuming the concentrate raw material is characteristic of the natural source (??), the usual primary microbiological target in a heat treatment will probably be as per the well-known US juice regs (predicated on 5D for Salmonella from memory)but this could depend on the actual flow chart as intimated by Tony's post..
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 17 September 2010 - 10:20 AM
Dear haleh,
Thks yr comments. Am sure that the other members of this forum are equally interested in yr results.
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users