Is a decision tree approach used to identify operational PRP's as is done for CCP's and if so can someone share an example I was thinking that there must be a logical way of doing this so that a clear and effective identification and separation of CCP's and OPRP's emerges and by difference what remains are PRP's.
Similarly, whereas critical limits are then assignable for CCP's , monitoring limits would be assignable for OPRP's and both would have correction, corrective action and verification requirements.
So by way of example my product is chocolate , a screen is being used to control metallic FM, the rationale for calling it an OPRP is what?, the monitoring limit or requirement is what?, if there is failure at this step , the correction step is what?, etc.
I am thinking that for the auditor or assessor coming in checkout the facility summary tables would exist showing the derivation of each CCP and OPRP respectively.
7.5 Establishing the operational prerequisite programmes (PRPs)
The operational PRPs shall be documented and shall include the following information for each programme:
a)food safety hazard(s) to be controlled by the programme
b)control measure(s)
c)monitoring procedures that demonstrate that the operational PRPs are implemented
d)corrections and corrective actions to be taken if monitoring shows that the operational PRPs are not in control
e)responsibilities and authorities
f)record(s) of monitoring
- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More