Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Metal Detector CCP - Not at end of process flow

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

BrittAnn66

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 22 January 2016 - 03:05 PM

Our grain elevator processes soybeans (raw product) packages it into to bags/bulk and is shipped around the world for further processing.

 

Currently our only CCP in our process flow is the metal detector which is the last point the beans cross before being bagged or loaded bulk into a container.

 

They are looking at doing some renovations to our plant and this would involve moving the metal detector causing it to no longer be the last point the beans cross before being bagged.

 

What does this mean as a CCP? Is this okay as long as there is no chance of metal getting into the product after the metal detector? What if the product passes through metal pieces of equipment?


  • 0

PSC

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 35 posts
  • 8 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 22 January 2016 - 03:37 PM

Is this just for your own internal safety, or are you trying to meet a standard? 

 

It shouldn't be a problem to have your metal detector not be at the end of your process. We have a metal detector CCP that is not at the end of our process and our BRC7 auditor had no issue with that. You'll just need to show through a risk assessment why it's okay for you to place your metal detector at that stage of your process. 


  • 0

QAGB

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 685 posts
  • 262 thanks
115
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 22 January 2016 - 04:42 PM

Our grain elevator processes soybeans (raw product) packages it into to bags/bulk and is shipped around the world for further processing.

 

Currently our only CCP in our process flow is the metal detector which is the last point the beans cross before being bagged or loaded bulk into a container.

 

They are looking at doing some renovations to our plant and this would involve moving the metal detector causing it to no longer be the last point the beans cross before being bagged.

 

What does this mean as a CCP? Is this okay as long as there is no chance of metal getting into the product after the metal detector? What if the product passes through metal pieces of equipment?

 

 

Is this just for your own internal safety, or are you trying to meet a standard? 

 

It shouldn't be a problem to have your metal detector not be at the end of your process. We have a metal detector CCP that is not at the end of our process and our BRC7 auditor had no issue with that. You'll just need to show through a risk assessment why it's okay for you to place your metal detector at that stage of your process.

 

 

Hi BrittAnn66,

 

Usually CCPs are the end points of the process (not always the last step in the process), where the particular hazard can be reduced or eliminated to an acceptable. As PSC said, you need to risk assess your process to ensure you can reduce the metal hazard to acceptable levels at the metal detector. It looks like by your own statement that there is no real chance metal could get into the product after the point where the metal detector is placed. In that sense, you should be fine (with justification).

 

 

QAGB


  • 0

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5699 thanks
1,552
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 23 January 2016 - 06:53 AM

Our grain elevator processes soybeans (raw product) packages it into to bags/bulk and is shipped around the world for further processing.

 

Currently our only CCP in our process flow is the metal detector which is the last point the beans cross before being bagged or loaded bulk into a container.

 

They are looking at doing some renovations to our plant and this would involve moving the metal detector causing it to no longer be the last point the beans cross before being bagged.

 

What does this mean as a CCP? Is this okay as long as there is no chance of metal getting into the product after the metal detector? What if the product passes through metal pieces of equipment?

 

Hi BrittAnn,

 

Merely as a corollary to the previous, it all depends on where it's being moved to. IMEX people do strange things for convenience.


  • 0

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,636 posts
  • 1385 thanks
749
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 24 January 2016 - 08:00 AM

Hi BrittAnn

The expectation would be that industry best practice is applied with regard to the location and that the equipment should be placed as close to the end of the production process as is practical, so that the whole process (including packing lines) is protected.

 

You will need to assess the risk regarding the equipment and process after the metal detector and you may need to introduce new checks to monitor these risks such as nuts/bolts that could fall into the product.

 

CCP's  are usually the last step in which as hazard is controlled/eliminated so they are not necessarily end points of the process.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Live Webinar next Friday May 09, 2025

Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. 

Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: 

:cheers: 

 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here


w.weber

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 39 posts
  • 15 thanks
4
Neutral

  • Germany
    Germany
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 January 2016 - 10:58 AM

Hello,

please have in mind, that there may be still a risk of having metal in later stages. If e.g. you are using conveyors like chain trough conveyor thre may be shavings from the conveyor contaminating your product. i know a case of a food manufacturer, who had an official recall, as shavings from a screw conveyor moved into the product.  So you should check all of your equipment (conveyor, stirrer, gate valves...) within the risk analysis.

 

Yours

Werner


  • 0

Meat Hook

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 7 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 03 June 2016 - 06:14 PM

Something to keep in mind. If you metal detect on large bags, the aperture size isn't going to allow you to detect the sizes of metal you are detecting now(assuming you are using either a low profile aperture or a cylinder style).


  • 0

redfox

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 481 posts
  • 163 thanks
24
Excellent

  • Philippines
    Philippines

Posted 04 June 2016 - 06:42 AM

Hello BrittAnn,

 

Even if your metal detecting is not at the end of the process, as long as the product is already enclosed in packaging nothing to worry about. In our plant our metal detecting step is before closing the product but we've been able to demonstrate to auditor that we have metal control procedure and measures that is functional.

 

Regards,

redfox


  • 0



Share this


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users