Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

What Peroxide Value should be for Panned Chocolate Almonds?

Panned Chocolate; Cookies

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 GreenFiat

GreenFiat

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 21 December 2016 - 09:53 PM

Hi, I work for  a company that manufactures panned chocolate confection and wire cut cookies.     With new regs, many customers are looking for micro values we have not been recording.   I'm trying to understand what a Peroxide Value should be for Panned Chocolate Almonds.   Any ideas?



#2 Simon

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,336 posts
  • 1296 thanks
604
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 03 January 2017 - 08:35 PM

This probably got missed as it was posted in new member introductions.

 

I've moved and retitled your topic, hopefully you'll get a response.

 

Anyhow welcome to the IFSQN.

 

Regards,

Simon


hand-pointing-down.gif
 
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 140 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html

 

recommend-us-on-facebook.png


#3 Scampi

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,832 posts
  • 779 thanks
344
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 03 January 2017 - 08:51 PM

http://www.almonds.c...development.pdf

 

Almonds Peroxide Value < 5 meq/Kg is considered the benchmark  However:  PV levels can decrease as oxidation progresses (decompose)


Because we always have is never an appropriate response!


Thanked by 1 Member:



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users