Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Threat Analysis CCP


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 ojiambo

ojiambo

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Kenya
    Kenya

Posted 23 June 2018 - 11:09 AM

Hi

 

I am in the process of coming up with TACCP for tree nuts( macadamia) processing facility , can anyone please assist with a sample TACCP for any food product so that i borrow an idea.

 

Tom

 

Thank you.



#2 John B Julius

John B Julius

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:06 AM

Hi Tom,

 

Have attached a reference, please go through this. It will help you.

 

Regards

John

Attached Files



#3 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,276 posts
  • 5121 thanks
1,124
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 24 June 2018 - 11:38 AM

Hi Tom,

 

Have attached a reference, please go through this. It will help you.

 

Regards

John

 

Thks but  this ref. is sort of antique.

 

Maybe try this one -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...plate-required/


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#4 pHruit

pHruit

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,632 posts
  • 670 thanks
369
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 29 June 2018 - 09:50 AM

The PAS96 standard has recently been updated, so for a more current version try: https://www.food.gov...t/pas962017.pdf



Thanked by 3 Members:

#5 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,276 posts
  • 5121 thanks
1,124
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 30 June 2018 - 11:11 AM

Re - PAS96/2017

 

IMO the difficulty with the food fraud approach in this otherwise useful publication is that, afai can see, there remain significant  differences with respect to GFSI's interpretation as implemented in most Private FS Codes

 

The result is that some terminologies are differently aligned making one's reading difficult, eg

 

(a) There is no mention of VACCP, only TACCP.

 

(b) Varying Scopes

6.2 Identifying vulnerabilities
NOTE In this section EMA, malicious contamination and cyber attack are used as examples of approaches to vulnerability assessment

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users