Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#26 nlesperance

nlesperance

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 31 posts
  • 8 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Ballet

Posted 12 September 2019 - 03:12 PM

I have attached an example SOP and sample chart for FFVAs! Retrieved off of Primus Labs :)

Attached Files



Thanked by 1 Member:

#27 jalex194021

jalex194021

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 42 posts
  • 5 thanks
8
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 12 September 2019 - 03:56 PM

Attached is what was sent to me by our last auditor.

 

 

FDA risk assessment for fraud: www.pwc.com/foodfraud

 

Resource for fraud claims in industry: http://foodfraud.msu.edu



#28 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,651 posts
  • 4941 thanks
996
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 13 September 2019 - 05:13 AM

I have attached an example SOP and sample chart for FFVAs! Retrieved off of Primus Labs :)

 

Hi nles,

 

Appreciate  yr attachments.

 

afai can tell (was unable to find a specific definition), Primus interpret food fraud via  -

 

There should be a vulnerability assessment and comprehensive protection plan for all types of food fraud. This includes economically motivated hazards, economically motivated food safety hazards, adulterant substances, theft, tampering, simulation, diversion or gray market, intellectual property rights and counterfeiting.

 

Kudos to Primus for attempting a meaningful example of a VA but IMO it unfortunately  lacks clarity, eg -

 

No example of use of the VA matrix, eg  "Consequences"  is presumably  interpreted via any/all of the above-listed  possibilities ??? But safety is not mentioned anywhere on the applicable Form ???

 

Similarly the "Consequence" requirements are solely stated in text as per the single paragraph, 1.11 -

 

Indicate the consequences of the identified vulnerability or risk (high, medium or low), in column 5

 

Based on What ??

 

Seems to me Primus should have produced one more Form illustrating filling in "Consequences"  + Use of the Matrix (for every question on the Form ???).

 

It looks like auditors  have sort of accepted that this topic is a conceptual Mess such that any "reasonable" solutions are OK.

 

 

Also see this  2018 thread which includes a few  Primus experiences -

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...ity-assessment/

.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#29 hjwdaniel

hjwdaniel

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Taiwan
    Taiwan

Posted 06 March 2020 - 06:32 PM

another one, but I like the one upstairs provided.

 

Thank you

Attached Files



#30 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,651 posts
  • 4941 thanks
996
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 06 March 2020 - 06:47 PM

another one, but I like the one upstairs provided.

 

Thank you

 

Hi hjwdaniel,

 

Sorry but IMO yr VACCP "Plan/Report" is sort of meaningless albeit not uninteresting.

 

As is also the one in Post 26 with respect to the comments in Post 28.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users