Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
- - - - -

Would a temporary ingredient substitutions be considered food fraud?

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Kay-Pops


    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks

  • Earth

Posted 22 March 2019 - 06:11 PM

Hi all, 


Quick question: Would a temporary ingredient substitutions (ie if there is a supply issue with normal ingredient) be considered food fraud? As we grow we are trying to find backup suppliers and trying to figure out what using those "backups" would mean NFP wise. Our product is sold direct to consumers and I just haven't found any clear answers anywhere else on the proper way to handle these types of supply issues. I hope this isn't a silly question, just a little lost  :wacko:

#2 SQFconsultant



  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,883 posts
  • 449 thanks

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Righting the ship for companies and getting them into the SQF certification channel, Saxophone, Growing Micro-Greens, Panama, Flying, Keto

Posted 22 March 2019 - 06:54 PM

No, it would not be.


Considering that you have or will have a supplier approval program you would follow your own guidelines for how to qualify an emergency supplier.

Warm regards,



Glenn Oster

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC


SQF On-Site System Development & Implementation Consultant

You Can DIY or Bring in the Professionals / We specialize in Small-to-Mid-Size 

Food, Food Contact Packaging & Food Logistic/Storage & Distribution


Pre-Development SQF GAP Analysis of Operational & Capital Needs

On-Site SQF System Development & Implementation Consulting

Internal Auditor Training Program / eConsultant 

772.646.4115 USA // glenn@glennosterconsulting.com

Boquete, Panama & Hampton, VA - US




SQF Pre-Development GAP Analysis -

Operational & Capital Compliance




Morning Keto Combo --


















#3 pHruit


    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 592 posts
  • 229 thanks

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 25 March 2019 - 09:45 AM

It's really going to depend on the nature of the temporary ingredient as compared to the normal ingredient, in the context of the overall product.
If you're buying a genuinely like-for-like replacement from an alternative source then that's absolutely fine, but if you're e.g. swapping an organic ingredient for a non-organic ingredient then that is not acceptable unless you've got approval to do so from your organic body.

If you're making a specific claim then it could also be considered food fraud - for example, if you label that your product uses "100% British Beef" then swapping to another source would be fraudulent unless you change your labels.

#4 zanorias


    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 464 posts
  • 112 thanks

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wales
  • Interests:Motorcycling, Food Safety, Science, Paddle-boarding, Nature

Posted 25 March 2019 - 11:40 AM

As pHruit mentioned, it's important to compare the two products and check for anything that can affect your product or invalidate claims. Allergens can be a tricky one; often customers require products free of certain/all allergens and substituting one ingredient from one supplier to another may affect the direct allergen content or even may-contain.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

EV SSL Certificate