Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Section 4.8 of BRC Agents and Brokers

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Meg9

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 16 October 2019 - 07:20 PM

Hi Everyone, 

 

Can someone please provide some information for the following?

 

Section 4.8.1 --> What are examples of processes that are in place to access information that may present a risk of adulteration?

 

Section 4.8.2 --> How do accesses the likelihood for each product to be vulnerable for adulteration? What kind of routine testing could you implement as a supplier?

 

Section 4.8.3 --> can the mitigation plan include documents or preventive controls used to prevent fraudulent acts?



arahman

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 75 posts
  • 27 thanks
10
Good

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 17 October 2019 - 12:43 PM

Section 4.8.1 --> What are examples of processes that are in place to access information that may present a risk of adulteration? supplier approval and monitoring is just one example.

You could also set up yourself or designate to have alerts set up for CFIA, FDA recalls.

you could also refer to https://www.usp.org/...rence-materials

https://trello.com/b...isk-information

 

 

Section 4.8.2 --> How do accesses the likelihood for each product to be vulnerable for adulteration? What kind of routine testing could you implement as a supplier?

My current company is an importer distributer of finished packaged goods so risk is low but depending on the nature of your product, type of product, availability(economic factors), nature of the product(solid, liquid, powder), historical evidence of adulteration from news sources, regulatory alerts,, recalls, end user and so on, are just some criteria to go by. e,g infant formula is higher risk due to all these factors.

 

Section 4.8.3 --> can the mitigation plan include documents or preventive controls used to prevent fraudulent acts?

I have added supplier approval and monitoring procedure as a preventive control. source material only from suppliers on the approved supplier list and approve suppliers based on relationship, GFSI recognized scheme, audit reports, self audits, COAs, specs and/or letter of guarantee.

 

Hope this helps



pHruit

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,071 posts
  • 849 thanks
536
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 17 October 2019 - 01:22 PM

This section of the standard is pretty much copied from the BRC food standard, and there are mountains of resources out there for that - you can use pretty much all of them as the standards are so similar in this area (I run the same system across our Food and A&B certification/activities).

As a starting point, the attached guide from BRC is worth a read.

The below are also some examples of thread from IFSQN, each of which contains various useful links, and there are many more - the search box towards the top right of the page will bring up loads of information.

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...itigation-plan/

https://www.ifsqn.co...ity-assessment/

https://www.ifsqn.co...sment-template/

https://www.ifsqn.co...se/#entry116201

 

In terms of your specific questions:

 

4.8.1 - the threads above have some links. Trello, RASFF etc are popular free resources. If you're a member of an industry body then try also contacting them as they may monitor things of particular reference to your industry.

 

4.8.2 - you'll need to do a vulnerability assessment. Have a read of the BRC guide that I've attached. The feasibility, nature, and relevance of testing will very much depend on the types of products that you handle. e.g. probably not that relevant for whole fresh fruit. If you can provide detail on the product range in question then we may be able to make more specific suggestions, but again it's possibly also worth talking to an industry body in your sector as they'll likely have lots of detail on this.

 

4.8.3 - yes, this can include preventative controls and documents, but they'll obviously need to be relevant within the context of the product, type of risk, and level of risk. The interpretation guide actually specifically states that it is preferable to use proactive controls rather than reactive measures such as testing. (If you've not yet got a copy, it's worth getting the interpretation guide - available free if you're on Participate, but worth buying if not).

Attached Files





Share this


Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: BRC, Product Authenticity, Vulnerability, Mitigation Plan, Risk of Adulteration

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users