If you take ISO 9001 really seriously, it's best you don't read this!
rgds Jim
Attached Files
Edited by Jim Wade, 19 July 2004 - 09:44 PM.
Posted 19 July 2004 - 09:42 PM
If you take ISO 9001 really seriously, it's best you don't read this!
rgds Jim
Edited by Jim Wade, 19 July 2004 - 09:44 PM.
Posted 07 September 2004 - 06:22 PM
If you take ISO 9001 really seriously, it's best you don't read this!
rgds Jim
Posted 08 September 2004 - 08:58 AM
Jim,
Excellent.
Thank you.
Alan
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:31 AM
Hi Jim,
Great satire. This stuff really gave me a good break and kept me going yesterday!
Picked up a new line also yesterday.........Japanese started 5S and I had this Thai Consultant who started on 5I
1. IMITATE
2. IMPROVE
3. IMPROVISE
4. INNOVATE
5. INVENT
Give it a thought. I thk it is damn good!
And about PDAC (ISO 9K).... there is PPP which stands for PLAN, PROMOTE, POLICE AND PRODUCE
CHarlesCHew
Posted 27 April 2006 - 09:46 PM
If you take ISO 9001 really seriously, it's best you don't read this!
rgds Jim
Posted 15 May 2006 - 12:47 PM
Hi Jim,
Great satire. This stuff really gave me a good break and kept me going yesterday!
Picked up a new line also yesterday.........Japanese started 5S and I had this Thai Consultant who started on 5I
1. IMITATE
2. IMPROVE
3. IMPROVISE
4. INNOVATE
5. INVENT
Give it a thought. I thk it is damn good!
And about PDAC (ISO 9K).... there is PPP which stands for PLAN, PROMOTE, POLICE AND PRODUCE
CHarlesCHew
Posted 17 May 2006 - 11:44 AM
Regarding '5I' - my business school lecturers attribute it to the Japanese also. Look at how they progress since the 1950/60's. First they imitate the Americans - take cars for example. Then they improve and improvise (toyota and datsun of the late 60/early 70). Then they innovate (70/80 period) and finally they invent. Last year, Toyota made more than a billion $, while GM lost more than 4 billion $.
The Koreans seems to be doing exactly the same but on a much sharper learning curve. Infact, this should be the model our local SMI's should be copying.
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
Posted 19 May 2006 - 02:26 AM
My question would be what happens next? In 20-30 years time will the shoe be back on the other foot, or will somebody different be wearing it?
By the way what are SMI's?
Welcome to the forums Chen.![]()
Regards,
Simon
Posted 19 May 2006 - 07:30 AM
I really must apologise Chen it appears I have done the same thing. When I said:I will try to remember not to use localized terms when posting in an international forum.
I didn't mean to turn the debate to shoes - I'll explain; in the UK when we say "the shoe is on the other foot" we mean it is the opposing persons turn. So what I meant was in 20-30 years time will the US be the leaders again or will it be neither Japan nor the US and be somebody completely different such as India or China.My question would be what happens next? In 20-30 years time will the shoe be back on the other foot, or will somebody different be wearing it?
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
Posted 19 May 2006 - 12:14 PM
It did give me a chuckle this morning. I'm sorry for being such a twit.
Hi Simon,
On the contrary, I think its a good discussion. I use the shoe example to illustrate innovation but what you mentioned is pertinent. There is this thing called the 'late starters' advantage. If countries like Korea mastered the '5I', they are going to catch up with many of the current leaders in terms of industrialization.
The first three 'I' will quickly enable them to bridge their gap with the leaders. But to innovate and invent, you need to have a big pool of talents and the relevant infrastructure and it will take time to catch up. Of course you can create a package to attract talents like what one of my neighbouring country is doing in biotechnology.
Rgds.
Posted 20 May 2006 - 12:45 PM
Of course you can create a package to attract talents like what one of my neighbouring country is doing in biotechnology.
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
Posted 22 May 2006 - 12:57 PM
Who / what is this Chen?
Posted 23 May 2006 - 06:58 AM
Thanks for the clarification Chen.
Regards,
Simon
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
Posted 23 May 2006 - 07:54 AM
The Koreans seems to be doing exactly the same but on a much sharper learning curve. Infact, this should be the model our local SMI's should be copying.
Posted 23 May 2006 - 09:29 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users