Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

How Safe Is Safe? Is 1/29,000 Fatalities Ok?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic
- - - - -

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,840 posts
  • 1364 thanks
886
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 09 January 2005 - 09:27 PM

Here is an assessment carried out by the Food Standards Agency on the effects of the new packaging legislation. They think the cost to industry will be approx. £50m to £100m  :spoton: .

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Topic split from: Eu Directive 89/2003, Allergens

Safer food comes at a price and someone has to foot the bill. It's a case of balancing risk V's cost. But are we tipping the scales to far?

Annual Fatality Risk From Selected Events

Risk of fatality (Probability in population)

Cigarette smoking (per smoker) 1/150
Cancer 1/300
Motor vehicle accident 1/5,000
Work accident (per work) 1/10,000
Home accident 1/11,000
Foodborne illness (all food) 1/29,000
Poisoning 1/37,000
Fire 1/50,000

The above stats are from the following article - worth a read!

Food-safety policy: balancing risk and costs - Charting the Costs of Food Safety

Regards,
Simon

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users